IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v39y2024i5p1350-1369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How hospital autonomy affects provider payment reform effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Sian Hsiang‐Te Tsuei
  • Winnie (Chi‐Man) Yip

Abstract

Background Provider payment reforms (PPRs) have demonstrated mixed results for improving health system efficiency. Since PPRs require health care organisations to interpret and implement policies, the organizational characteristics of hospitals may affect the effectiveness of PPRs. Hospitals with more autonomy have the flexibility to respond to PPRs more efficiently, but they may not if the autonomy previously facilitated behaviours that counter the PPR's objective. This study examines whether hospitals with higher autonomy responds to PPRs more effectively. Methods We used data from a matched‐pair, cluster randomized controlled PPR intervention in a resource‐limited Chinese province between 2014 and 2018. The intervention reformed the reimbursement method from the publicly administered New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) from fee‐for‐service to global budget. We interacted measures of hospital autonomy over surplus, hiring, and procurement (drugs, consumables, equipment, and overall index) with the difference‐in‐difference estimator to examine how autonomy moderated the intervention's effect. Results Autonomy over surplus (p 0.05). Post hoc analysis suggests that hospitals with surplus autonomy had higher OOP per admission (p

Suggested Citation

  • Sian Hsiang‐Te Tsuei & Winnie (Chi‐Man) Yip, 2024. "How hospital autonomy affects provider payment reform effectiveness," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 1350-1369, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:5:p:1350-1369
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:39:y:2024:i:5:p:1350-1369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.