IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v36y2021i5p1397-1406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘hub and spoke model’ for the management of surgical patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Ramanathan Kasivisvanathan
  • Henry S. Tilney
  • Shaman Jhanji
  • Michelle O’Mahony
  • Pascale Gruber
  • David Nicol
  • Dominic Morgan
  • Emma Kipps
  • Shahnawaz Rasheed

Abstract

During the on‐going COVID‐19 pandemic a number of key public health services have been severely impacted. These include elective surgical services due to the synergetic resources required to provide both perioperative surgical care whilst also treating acute COVID‐19 patients and also the poor outcomes associated with surgical patients who develop COVID‐19 in the perioperative period. This article discusses the important principles and concepts for providing important surgical services during the COVID‐19 pandemic based on the model of the RMCancerSurgHub which is providing surgical cancer services for a population of approximately 2 million people across London during the pandemic. The model focusses on creating local and regional hub centres which provide urgent treatment for surgical patients in an environment that is relatively protected from the burden of COVID‐19 illness. The model extensively utilises the extended multidisciplinary team to allow for a flexible approach with core services delivered in ‘clean’ sites which can adapt to viral surges. A key requirement is that of a clinical prioritisation process which allows for equity in access within and between specialties ensuring that patients are treated on the basis of greatest need, while at the same time protecting those whose conditions can safely wait from exposure to the virus. Importantly, this model has the ability to scale‐up activity and lead units and networks into the recovery phase. The model discussed is also broadly applicable to providing surgical services during any viral pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramanathan Kasivisvanathan & Henry S. Tilney & Shaman Jhanji & Michelle O’Mahony & Pascale Gruber & David Nicol & Dominic Morgan & Emma Kipps & Shahnawaz Rasheed, 2021. "The ‘hub and spoke model’ for the management of surgical patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1397-1406, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:5:p:1397-1406
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Li & Chi-Wei Su & Meng Qin & Fahai Zhao, 2020. "Testing for Bubbles in the Chinese Art Market," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    2. Koen B. Pouwels & Laurence S. J. Roope & Adrian Barnett & David J. Hunter & Terry M. Nolan & Philip M. Clarke, 2020. "Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2: Forward to the Past?," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 207-210, June.
    3. Jianning Kong & Peter C. B. Phillips & Donggyu Sul, 2020. "Testing Convergence Using HAR Inference," Advances in Econometrics, in: Essays in Honor of Cheng Hsiao, volume 41, pages 25-72, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khan, Khalid & Derindere Köseoğlu, Sinem, 2020. "Is palladium price in bubble?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    2. Assaf, Ata & Kristoufek, Ladislav & Demir, Ender & Kumar Mitra, Subrata, 2021. "Market efficiency in the art markets using a combination of long memory, fractal dimension, and approximate entropy measures," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Vincent Brault & Bastien Mallein & Jean-François Rupprecht, 2021. "Group testing as a strategy for COVID-19 epidemiological monitoring and community surveillance," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Rodríguez Benavides, Domingo & Mendoza González, Miguel Ángel & Muller Durán, Nancy Ivonne, 2022. "Convergencia regional sigma débil en México: 1970-2019," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 54, pages 29-49.
    5. Khan, Khalid & Su, Chi-Wei & Rehman, Ashfaq U., 2021. "Do multiple bubbles exist in coal price?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Plastun, Alex & Bouri, Elie & Havrylina, Ahniia & Ji, Qiang, 2022. "Calendar anomalies in passion investments: Price patterns and profit opportunities," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    7. Ma, Yongfan & Qi, Tiancheng, 2023. "China mainland art investment: Return and portfolio," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PC).
    8. Pritha Guha, 2022. "Application of Pooled Testing Methodologies in Tackling the COVID-19 Pandemic," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 47(1), pages 7-21, February.
    9. Constantin Ciucurel & Elena Ioana Iconaru, 2020. "An Epidemiological Study on the Prevalence of the Clinical Features of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Romanian People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    10. Binge, Laurie H. & Boshoff, Willem H., 2021. "Measuring alternative asset prices in an emerging market: The case of the South African art market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    11. Emmanuel Joel Aikins Abakah & Aviral Kumar Tiwari & Emmanuel Kwesi Arthur & Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana, 2023. "The influence of economic policy uncertainty shocks on art market," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(29), pages 3404-3421, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:5:p:1397-1406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.