IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v36y2021i4p1153-1165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational climate for safe and effective inter‐unit handoffs in Japanese hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Xiuzhu Gu
  • Kenji Itoh

Abstract

Objectives To extract the organizational climate factors that contribute to safe and effective inter‐unit patient handoffs, as well as to capture their crucial characteristics in the context of current Japanese hospitals. Methods A questionnaire survey was conducted among nursing staff in 31 general hospitals, collecting a total of 5117 valid responses (69% response rate). Results A five‐factor model was established to determine the inter‐unit handoff climate within hospitals. This comprised information and responsibility‐related risk, role understanding, communication, handoff environment, and guidelines and process. Based on nursing staff perceptions, the inter‐unit handoff climate in Japanese hospitals were generally found to be moderate or moderate‐to‐high levels across all five of the factors. Nursing staff's perceptions of all five climate factors differed significantly across hospitals and work units, rather than working conditions (full‐time vs. part‐time) or professions (nurse vs. nurse assistant). All five handoff factors were verified their significant impacts on patient safety awareness and handoff quality. Furthermore, in hospitals where staff perceptions of handoff climate were more positive, information was transferred more effectively. Conclusions An inter‐unit handoff climate structure was extracted and verified its impact on handoff quality and safety. Due to moderate climate levels in Japanese hospitals, as well as background factors such as low risk awareness among staff and busy situations, promoting a more positive organizational culture is suggested for creating safer and more effective inter‐unit handoffs. Improving the current handoff guidelines and processes in hospitals and using non‐licensed assistive staff more effectively are also recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiuzhu Gu & Kenji Itoh, 2021. "Organizational climate for safe and effective inter‐unit handoffs in Japanese hospitals," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1153-1165, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:4:p:1153-1165
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3162
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronny Enger & Birgitta Andershed, 2018. "Nurses’ experience of the transfer of ICU patients to general wards: A great responsibility and a huge challenge," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 186-194, January.
    2. Rachel Cross & Julie Considine & Judy Currey, 2019. "Nursing handover of vital signs at the transition of care from the emergency department to the inpatient ward: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 1010-1021, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun-Yi Yang, 2022. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Neonatal Nursing Practicum and Extended Reality Simulation Training Needs: A Descriptive and Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Anne Mette Nygaard & Hege Selnes Haugdahl & Berit Støre Brinchmann & Ranveig Lind, 2020. "Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover—The clinicians’ «game of whispers»: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3822-3834, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:4:p:1153-1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.