IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v36y2021i2p442-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with the choice of primary treatment at the community level among the middle‐aged and elderly in China

Author

Listed:
  • Tiantian Tao
  • Lili Hou
  • Rong Shao

Abstract

Background As China is still in the process of establishing the hierarchical medical system, people have full autonomy in choosing medical institutions when they need to see a doctor. The basic working of a hierarchical medical system involves four parts: primary treatment at the community level, two‐way referral, a partition of emergency and chronic disease, and a joint effort among different healthcare facilities. This study examines factors associated with primary healthcare use in a middle‐aged and elderly Chinese population. Methods Our study is a cross‐sectional and observational survey involving 1659 adults aged 45 and above. The data are from the 2015 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. According to the Andersen behavioral model, we used logistic regression to analyze the influencing factors of healthcare services utilization, including predisposing, enabling, and need factors. We also compared the relative importance of factors to healthcare services utilization by analysis of variance. Results During the recently 1‐month period, 63.89% of the sample had their last visit to a primary healthcare facility. In the final logistic model, there were three predisposing characteristics (education level, children number, and work status), three enabling factors (household status, out‐of‐pocket expenses, and travel time to the healthcare facilities), and one need factor (three specific chronic diseases) were significantly associated with primary healthcare use. Having received more education, taking more travel time to the healthcare facility, paying more out‐of‐pocket expenses, and having heart problems were associated with a lower probability of choosing the primary healthcare facility. However, having more children, being still at work, with agricultural household status, diabetes, and arthritis were associated with a higher likelihood of having primary healthcare facility visits. Among all the factors, the three most powerful determinants were out‐of‐pocket expenses, travel time to the healthcare facility, and education. Conclusions Policymakers need to consider these factors when improving the system of primary treatment at the community level, including improving reimbursement policy to distinguish the payment standard between hospitals and primary healthcare facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tiantian Tao & Lili Hou & Rong Shao, 2021. "Factors associated with the choice of primary treatment at the community level among the middle‐aged and elderly in China," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 442-458, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:2:p:442-458
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3093
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Health Organization & World Bank Group & OECD, 2018. "Delivering Quality Health Services," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 29970, December.
    2. Hongli Jiang & Wen Chen & Kangning Bi & Xiaohua Ying, 2009. "Are services delivered by community health centers more cost‐effective? Evidence from urban China," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(S2), pages 107-117, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peters, Luke & MacKenzie, Don, 2019. "The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 208-226.
    2. Xiaolin Wei & Haitao Li & Nan Yang & Samuel Y S Wong & Onikepe Owolabi & Jianguang Xu & Leiyu Shi & Jinling Tang & Donald Li & Sian M Griffiths, 2015. "Comparing Quality of Public Primary Care between Hong Kong and Shanghai Using Validated Patient Assessment Tools," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Andrew M Briggs & Islene Araujo de Carvalho, 2018. "Actions required to implement integrated care for older people in the community using the World Health Organization's ICOPE approach: A global Delphi consensus study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Nicholas Stacey & Andrew Mirelman & Noemi Kreif & Marc Suhrcke & Karen Hofman & Ijeoma Edoka, 2021. "Facility standards and the quality of public sector primary care: Evidence from South Africa's “Ideal Clinics” program," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(7), pages 1543-1558, July.
    5. Yun Chai & Hancheng Xu & Wenxin Wang & Bing Liu & Dehua Yang & Hong Fan & Fujian Song & Zuxun Lu, 2011. "A Survey of Factors Associated with the Utilization of Community Health Centers for Managing Hypertensive Patients in Chengdu, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-7, July.
    6. Wittmer, Josie, 2021. "“We live and we do this work”: Women waste pickers’ experiences of wellbeing in Ahmedabad, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    7. Lee Worden & Rae Wannier & Nicole A Hoff & Kamy Musene & Bernice Selo & Mathias Mossoko & Emile Okitolonda-Wemakoy & Jean Jacques Muyembe Tamfum & George W Rutherford & Thomas M Lietman & Anne W Rimoi, 2019. "Projections of epidemic transmission and estimation of vaccination impact during an ongoing Ebola virus disease outbreak in Northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, as of Feb. 25, 2019," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Gómez-Villegas, Mauricio & Larrinaga, Carlos, 2023. "A critical accounting project for Latin America? Objects of knowledge or ways of knowing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    9. Yanwei Ding & Jianwei Qu & Xiaosong Yu & Shuang Wang, 2014. "The Mediating Effects of Burnout on the Relationship between Anxiety Symptoms and Occupational Stress among Community Healthcare Workers in China: A Cross-Sectional Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-7, September.
    10. Oliver Fisher & Paolo Fabbietti & Giovanni Lamura, 2021. "Socio-Economic Predictors of Hiring Live-In Migrant Care Workers to Support Community Dwelling Older Adults with Long-Term Care Needs: Recent Evidence from a Central Italian Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Eboreime, Ejemai Amaize & Olawepo, John Olajide & Banke-Thomas, Aduragbemi & Ramaswamy, Rohit, 2021. "Evaluating the design and implementation fidelity of an adapted Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to improve health system performance in a Nigerian state," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Chin, Marshall H. & King, Paula T. & Jones, Rhys G. & Jones, Bryn & Ameratunga, Shanthi N. & Muramatsu, Naoko & Derrett, Sarah, 2018. "Lessons for achieving health equity comparing Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 837-853.
    13. Fanzo, Jessica & Haddad, Lawrence & Schneider, Kate R. & Béné, Christophe & Covic, Namukolo M. & Guarin, Alejandro & Herforth, Anna W. & Herrero, Mario & Sumaila, U. Rashid & Aburto, Nancy J. & Amuyun, 2021. "Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:2:p:442-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.