IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i1pe661-e678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“‘Academic’ is a dirty word”: Intended impact pathways of an emerging academic health centre in tropical regional Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Edelman
  • Judy Taylor
  • Pavel V. Ovseiko
  • Stephanie M. Topp

Abstract

Background The Tropical Australian Academic Health Centre (TAAHC) is being established in northern Queensland across a vast rural geography. The study aim is to identify intended impact pathways and beneficiaries of TAAHC as well as experienced and anticipated challenges. Methodology The study is an empirical case study nested within a comparative multi‐case study on academic health centres (AHCs). Data were collected from documents, observation, and interviews with 24 health system and university stakeholders. Intended impact pathways were identified abductively from analysis of aspirations and challenges. Results Aspirations of TAAHC reflect an ultimate aim to improve the health of the northern Queensland population. Challenges were trust and communication, understanding value and return on investment, health system receptiveness to building a research culture, prioritising and influencing the research agenda, and structure of the health system. Discussion The study identifies three interdependent transitions that comprise the main intended impact pathway in TAAHC. Stakeholders expected TAAHC to effect health systems change and improvement rather than drive discovery‐oriented academic research associated with AHCs elsewhere. Conclusion The findings contribute to the empirical evidence base on the role of AHCs internationally and to ongoing initiatives to establish and resource AHCs in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Edelman & Judy Taylor & Pavel V. Ovseiko & Stephanie M. Topp, 2019. "“‘Academic’ is a dirty word”: Intended impact pathways of an emerging academic health centre in tropical regional Australia," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 661-678, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:e661-e678
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2681
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2681?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferlie, Ewan & Crilly, Tessa & Jashapara, Ashok & Peckham, Anna, 2012. "Knowledge mobilisation in healthcare: A critical review of health sector and generic management literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(8), pages 1297-1304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Edelman, Alexandra & Taylor, Judy & Ovseiko, Pavel V & Larkins, Sarah & Topp, Stephanie M, 2022. "The population health role of academic health centres: a multiple-case exploratory study in Australia and England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(10), pages 1051-1061.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Knowledge Management e modelli strategici in sanit?. Una review strutturata della letteratura," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 73-91.
    2. FIASO Federazione Asl e Ospedali, 2017. "Sviluppo di standard di erogazione dell?attivit? ambulatoriale per la riorganizzazione di un?Azienda Sanitaria Locale," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(103), pages 95-115.
    3. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    4. Ii, Suzanne Sayuri & Fitzgerald, Louise & Morys-Carter, Megan M. & Davie, Natasha L. & Barker, Richard, 2018. "Knowledge translation in tri-sectoral collaborations: An exploration of perceptions of academia, industry and healthcare collaborations in innovation adoption," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 175-183.
    5. Ann Svensson, 2020. "Identifying Motives for Implementing eHealth by using Activity Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, February.
    6. Anne Lunden & Marianne Teräs & Tarja Kvist & Arja Häggman‐Laitila, 2019. "Transformative agency and tensions in knowledge management—A qualitative interview study for nurse leaders," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 969-979, March.
    7. French, Catherine E. & Ferlie, Ewan & Fulop, Naomi J., 2014. "The international spread of Academic Health Science Centres: A scoping review and the case of policy transfer to England," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(3), pages 382-391.
    8. Lindberg, Kajsa & Mørk, Bjørn Erik & Walter, Lars, 2019. "Emergent coordination and situated learning in a Hybrid OR: The mixed blessing of using radiation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 232-239.
    9. Fitzgerald, Louise & Harvey, Gill, 2015. "Translational networks in healthcare? Evidence on the design and initiation of organizational networks for knowledge mobilization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 192-200.
    10. Pereira, Vijay & Bamel, Umesh, 2021. "Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 557-570.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:e661-e678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.