IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v52y2021i2p1117-1136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatiotemporal evolution of production cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on the input–output technique

Author

Listed:
  • Zhi Zheng
  • Zhouying Song
  • Qidi Ji
  • Wei Xiong

Abstract

Despite frequent political interactions, economic cooperation between China and Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) countries has progressed quite slowly, raising the question of why the economic cooperation of China and CEE countries stagnates and how to promote sustainable bilateral cooperation. This study explored the spatiotemporal evolution of China–CEE production cooperation and the value‐added structure of bilateral exports by the long time‐sequenced multi‐region input–output table and methods of input–output technique. The results show that although the production cooperation intensity of China and CEE countries has been increasing in both directions, neither side currently comprises the main foreign production cooperation direction of each other, and the intensity of production cooperation remains low. From the perspective of value‐added structure, foreign value‐added accounts comprise the greatest proportion of exports from CEE countries to China, while a large part of China’s intermediate exports go to other European countries after being imported by CEE countries, which indicates that CEE countries have played an important role of the bridge between China and Europe. States are undoubtedly important in the promotion of global value chain connections. Governments should correctly identify their own advantageous industries in global value chains and focus on extending the industrial chain to formulate cooperation plans. Strengthening the value chain link with Western European countries through production cooperation and improving the capacity of value capture are important directions for China–CEE cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhi Zheng & Zhouying Song & Qidi Ji & Wei Xiong, 2021. "Spatiotemporal evolution of production cooperation between China and Central and Eastern European countries: An analysis based on the input–output technique," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 1117-1136, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:52:y:2021:i:2:p:1117-1136
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12476
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.12476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Büthe & Walter Mattli, 2011. "The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 9470.
    2. Tamas Matura, 2019. "China–CEE Trade, Investment and Politics," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 388-407, March.
    3. Zuokui Liu, 2017. "China-CEEC Cooperation: China’s Building of a New Type of International Relations," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(78), pages 19-34, August.
    4. Henry Wai-chung Yeung, 2015. "Regional development in the global economy: A dynamic perspective of strategic coupling in global production networks," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Jappe Eckhardt & Arlo Poletti, 2018. "Introduction: Bringing Institutions Back in the Study of Global Value Chains," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 9(S2), pages 5-11, October.
    6. Koopman, Robert & Wang, Zhi & Wei, Shang-Jin, 2012. "Estimating domestic content in exports when processing trade is pervasive," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 178-189.
    7. Anna Grzywacz, 2020. "Closer to a threat than an opportunity: Polish perception of China’s rise and international engagement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 177-194, March.
    8. Anastas Vangeli, 2017. "China's Engagement with the Sixteen Countries of Central, East and Southeast Europe under the Belt and Road Initiative," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 25(5), pages 101-124, September.
    9. Robert Koopman & William Powers & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2010. "Give Credit Where Credit Is Due: Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains," NBER Working Papers 16426, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2008. "How Much of Chinese Exports is Really Made In China? Assessing Domestic Value-Added When Processing Trade is Pervasive," NBER Working Papers 14109, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Koopman & Zhi Wang & Shang-Jin Wei, 2014. "Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(2), pages 459-494, February.
    2. Eichengreen, Barry & Tong, Hui, 2015. "Effects of renminbi appreciation on foreign firms: The role of processing exports," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 146-157.
    3. Benno Ferrarini, 2013. "Vertical Trade Maps," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 27(2), pages 105-123, June.
    4. Xing, Lizhi & Dong, Xianlei & Guan, Jun, 2017. "Global industrial impact coefficient based on random walk process and inter-country input–output table," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 576-591.
    5. Heiwai Tang & Fei Wang & Zhi Wang, 2014. "The Domestic Segment of Global Supply Chains in China under State Capitalism," CESifo Working Paper Series 4797, CESifo.
    6. Richard Baldwin & Javier Lopez-Gonzalez, 2015. "Supply-chain Trade: A Portrait of Global Patterns and Several Testable Hypotheses," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(11), pages 1682-1721, November.
    7. Bernhard Michel & Caroline Hambÿe & Bart Hertveldt, 2018. "The Role of Exporters and Domestic Producers in GVCs: Evidence for Belgium based on Extended National Supply-and-Use Tables Integrated into a Global Multiregional Input-Output Table," NBER Working Papers 25155, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Gustavo Adolfo HERNANDEZ DIAZ, 2014. "Especialización Vertical de las Exportaciones Colombianas," Archivos de Economía 11805, Departamento Nacional de Planeación.
    9. Nenci, Silvia & Fusacchia, Ilaria & Giunta, Anna & Montalbano, Pierluigi & Pietrobelli, Carlo, 2022. "Mapping global value chain participation and positioning in agriculture and food: stylised facts, empirical evidence and critical issues," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 11(2), July.
    10. Hiroyuki Taguchi & Jun Zhao, 2022. "China's global value chain linkage and logistics performances in emerging ASEAN economies," International Studies of Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 126-155, July.
    11. Upward, Richard & Wang, Zheng & Zheng, Jinghai, 2013. "Weighing China’s export basket: The domestic content and technology intensity of Chinese exports," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 527-543.
    12. Michelle Connolly & Kei-Mu Yi, 2015. "How Much of South Korea's Growth Miracle Can Be Explained by Trade Policy?," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 188-221, October.
    13. Bullón, David & Mena, Tayutic & Meng, Bo & Sánchez, Natalia & Vargas, Henry & Inomata, Satoshi, 2015. "Using the input-output approach to measure participation in GVCs : the case of Costa Rica," IDE Discussion Papers 529, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    14. Syed Al-Helal Uddin, 2016. "Value-added Trade, Exchange Rate Pass-Through and Trade Elasticity: Revisiting the Trade Competitiveness," 2016 Papers pud11, Job Market Papers.
    15. Ferrantino, Michael J., 2012. "Using supply chain analysis to examine the costs of non-tariff measures (NTMs) and the benefits of trade facilitation," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2012-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    16. Inomata, Satoshi, 2013. "Trade in Value Added: An East Asian Perspective," ADBI Working Papers 451, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    17. Lectard, Pauline & Rougier, Eric, 2018. "Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 90-110.
    18. Sun, Chuanwang & Zhan, Yanhong & Gao, Xiang, 2023. "Does environmental regulation increase domestic value-added in exports? An empirical study of cleaner production standards in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Boya Zhang & Shukuan Bai & Yadong Ning & Tao Ding & Yan Zhang, 2020. "Emission Embodied in International Trade and Its Responsibility from the Perspective of Global Value Chain: Progress, Trends, and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    20. Meng, Bo & Yamano, Norihiko & Webb, Colin, 2010. "Vertical specialisation indicator based on supply-driven input-output model," IDE Discussion Papers 270, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:52:y:2021:i:2:p:1117-1136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.