IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v8y2017i2p191-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Turkey's and BRICS’ Voting Cohesion in the UN General Assembly during 2002–2014

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Murat Kurşun
  • Emel Parlar Dal

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Murat Kurşun & Emel Parlar Dal, 2017. "An Analysis of Turkey's and BRICS’ Voting Cohesion in the UN General Assembly during 2002–2014," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(2), pages 191-201, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:191-201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1758-5899.12405
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lijphart, Arend, 1963. "The Analysis of Bloc Voting in the General Assembly: A Critique and a Proposal," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(4), pages 902-917, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Baumann, Max-Otto & Novoselova, Anna & Surasky, Javier & Schönrock, Philipp, 2024. "The Group of 77 and global dialogue in the United Nations General Assembly," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2024, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrienne Armstrong, 1981. "The Political Consequences of Economic Dependence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(3), pages 401-428, September.
    2. Tekleselassie, Tsegay Gebrekidan, 2016. "Three essays on the impact of institutions and policies on socio-economic outcomes," Economics PhD Theses 1316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    3. Kul B. Rai, 1982. "UN Voting Data," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 26(1), pages 188-192, March.
    4. Simon Hug & Richard Lukács, 2014. "Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 83-106, March.
    5. Michael W. Manulak, 2024. "The sources of influence in multilateral diplomacy: Replaceability and intergovernmental networks in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 579-610, September.
    6. Yan, Jiaqiang & Zhou, Yonghong, 2021. "Economic return to political support: Evidence from voting on the representation of China in the United Nations," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:531-554 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Plouffe, Michael, 2024. "The Public and the Assembly: Foreign Public Opinion and Voting in the UNGA," OSF Preprints pu2yv, Center for Open Science.
    9. Ulf Jakobsson, 2009. "An International Actor Under Pressure: The Impact of the War on Terror and the Fifth Enlargement on EU Voting Cohesion at the UN General Assembly 2000–05," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 531-554, June.
    10. Thomas R. Hensley, 1978. "Bloc Voting on the International Court of Justice," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 22(1), pages 39-59, March.
    11. Amanov, Shatlyk, 2021. "An empirical analysis of the EAEU’s voting behavior in the UN General Assembly, 2000–2020," OSF Preprints 6xfyu, Center for Open Science.
    12. Drieskens, Edith & Van Genderen, Ruben & Reykers, Yf, 2014. "From indications to indicators: Measuring regional leadership in the UN context," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 151-171.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:2:p:191-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.