IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024is2p97-109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is power shifting? China's evolving engagement with UNESCO

Author

Listed:
  • Wenting Meng

Abstract

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) presents itself as a global laboratory of ideas. In 2022, China became the largest financial contributor to UNESCO at a time when the United States had been absent from the organisation for 4 years. Against this backdrop, a focus on whether or not China has become a more powerful actor within UNESCO is timely and capable of adding a new dimension to the existing body of literature on China's participation in global governance. This paper draws on UNESCO reports and data, as well as interviews with UNESCO officials and Chinese diplomats. Building on Barnett and Duvall's power typology, the article concludes that China's power within UNESCO has increased, yet unevenly. China is regarded as a moderate contributor rather than a challenger to existing power constellations in terms of compulsory power, structural power and productive power. However, China has shaped new industry norms and rules in the professional domain of UNESCO, reflecting institutional power shifts. Moreover, China's mechanisms of indirect influence within UNESCO have shifted towards a strategy referred to as ‘homeland diplomacy’, expanding the range of stakeholders to include experts, private sector entities and universities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenting Meng, 2024. "Is power shifting? China's evolving engagement with UNESCO," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 97-109, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:97-109
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13373
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13373?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Toye, 2014. "Assessing the G77: 50 years after and 40 years after the," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 1759-1774, November.
    2. Haas, Ernst B., 1961. "International Integration: The European and the Universal Process," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(3), pages 366-392, July.
    3. Sebastian Haug, 2021. "A Thirdspace approach to the ‘Global South’: insights from the margins of a popular category," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(9), pages 2018-2038, September.
    4. Finnemore, Martha & Sikkink, Kathryn, 1998. "International Norm Dynamics and Political Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(4), pages 887-917, October.
    5. Andreas Kruck & Bernhard Zangl, 2020. "The Adjustment of International Institutions to Global Power Shifts: A Framework for Analysis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(S3), pages 5-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueying Zhang & Yijia Jing, 2024. "A mixed funding pattern: China's exercise of power within the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 121-134, May.
    2. Sebastian Haug & Rosemary Foot & Max‐Otto Baumann, 2024. "Power shifts in international organisations: China at the United Nations," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 5-17, May.
    3. Steven Langendonk & Edith Drieskens, 2024. "Chinese power in the World Heritage Committee: From learning the game to shaping the rules," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 110-120, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Max‐Otto Baumann & Sebastian Haug & Silke Weinlich, 2024. "From developing country to superpower? China, power shifts and the United Nations development pillar," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S2), pages 51-61, May.
    2. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Comparative Regionalism - A New Research Agenda," KFG Working Papers p0028, Free University Berlin.
    3. Hai Yang, 2023. "Rhetorical coercion, institutional legitimacy and the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 730-741, November.
    4. Ummu Salma Bava, 2017. "India and the Global Order," International Studies, , vol. 54(1-4), pages 22-41, January.
    5. Steininger, Lea & Hesse, Casimir, 2024. "Buying into new ideas: The ECB’s evolving justification of unlimited liquidity," Department of Economics Working Paper Series 357, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    6. Haroldo Ramanzini Junior & Bruno Theodoro Luciano, 2021. "Regional (dis)integration beyond governments: A comparison in social and civil society participation between Mercosur and SADC," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 18-34, March.
    7. Jo-Ansie van Wyk, 2015. "South Africa’s Post-apartheid Nuclear Diplomacy: Practice and Principles," Insight on Africa, , vol. 7(2), pages 108-119, July.
    8. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    9. Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús & Rapoport, Hillel, 2014. "Tradable immigration quotas," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 94-108.
    10. Federico Maria Ferrara & Jörg S Haas & Andrew Peterson & Thomas Sattler, 2022. "Exports vs. Investment: How Public Discourse Shapes Support for External Imbalances," Post-Print hal-02569351, HAL.
    11. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    12. Cath, Corinne, 2021. "The technology we choose to create: Human rights advocacy in the Internet Engineering Task Force," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    13. James D. Morrow & Hyeran Jo, 2006. "Compliance with the Laws of War: Dataset and Coding Rules," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(1), pages 91-113, February.
    14. Leonardo Baccini & Soo Kim, 2012. "Preventing protectionism: International institutions and trade policy," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 369-398, December.
    15. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:993-1013 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    17. Marco Grasso & J. David Tàbara, 2019. "Towards a Moral Compass to Guide Sustainability Transformations in a High-End Climate Change World," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Holzscheiter, Anna & Gholiagha, Sassan & Liese, Andrea, 2022. "Advocacy Coalition Constellations and Norm Collisions: Insights from International Drug Control, Human Trafficking, and Child Labour," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 25-48.
    19. Thereza RS de Aguiar, 2018. "Turning accounting for emissions rights inside out as well as upside down," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 139-159, February.
    20. Samuel Makinda, 2016. "Terrorism in International Society: An Eclectic Perspective," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 3(1), pages 90-101, April.
    21. Trithara, Dakoda, 2024. "Agents of platform governance: Analyzing U.S. civil society's role in contesting online content moderation," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:s2:p:97-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.