IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v15y2024i2p443-450.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why China supports NDB membership expansion: Going multilateral amid power struggles

Author

Listed:
  • Jiejin Zhu

Abstract

This article aims to detail why China supports the expansion of the NDB membership, arguing that NDB membership expansion is a medium‐term solution to help manage geopolitical rivalry and tensions between state powers in the NDB. The BRICS equality and consensus‐oriented governance arrangements are unique governance features of the NDB, however, Chinese officials have observed that these organizational structures have become the conduits for geopolitical tensions to be transmitted into the functioning of the Bank, specifically as the India‐China tensions, and the growing conflict between Russia and the West. China's strategy is that the addition of more members to the NDB will help to dilute the inter‐state tensions by expanding and diversifying the number of voices at the decision‐making table, as well as the capital contribution base for the Bank, and the scope of potential borrowers. China is pursuing an “increase in multilateralism” to help with managing the inter‐state rivalries that have been transmitted into the Bank, a medium‐term strategy for reducing conflict between the BRICS governments within the NDB, and for maintaining the collective cohesion of the BRICS as a diplomatic grouping.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiejin Zhu, 2024. "Why China supports NDB membership expansion: Going multilateral amid power struggles," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 443-450, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:443-450
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongying Wang, 2017. "New Multilateral Development Banks: Opportunities and Challenges for Global Governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(1), pages 113-118, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew F. Cooper, 2017. "The BRICS’ New Development Bank: Shifting from Material Leverage to Innovative Capacity," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(3), pages 275-284, September.
    2. Bas Hooijmaaijers, 2021. "The BRICS Countries’ Bilateral Economic Relations, 2009 to 2019: Between Rhetoric and Reality," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Gregory T. Chin, 2024. "Introduction – The evolution of New Development Bank (NDB): A decade plus in the making," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 368-382, May.
    4. Helble, Matthias & Ali, Zulfiqar & Lego, Jera, 2018. "A Comparison of Global Governance Across Sectors: Global Health, Trade, and Multilateral Development Finance," ADBI Working Papers 806, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    5. Hang Luo & Lize Yang & Kourosh Houshmand, 2021. "Power Structure Dynamics in Growing Multilateral Development Banks: The Case of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 24-39, February.
    6. Fang Ye, 2023. "The New Development Bank and the structure of the multilateral development financial system," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 1957-1972, August.
    7. Fatih Kayhan & Onur Özdemir, 2022. "The Lending Behavior of Investment and Development Banks in Turkiye: Evidence from Quantile Regression Approach," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 72(72-1), pages 239-267, June.
    8. Gu, Jing & Renwick, Neil & Xue, Lan, 2018. "The BRICS and Africa's search for green growth, clean energy and sustainable development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 675-683.
    9. Israel Nyaburi Nyadera & UÄŸur Yasin Asal & Billy Agwanda, 2021. "The Role of Regional Organisations in Economic Growth Among Developing Countries: A Case of the Af DB," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 77(3), pages 384-403, September.
    10. Hang Luo & Lize Yang, 2021. "Equality and Equity in Emerging Multilateral Financial Institutions: The Case of the BRICS Institutions," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(4), pages 482-508, September.
    11. Andrew F. Cooper & Brendon J. Cannon, 2024. "The United Arab Emirates and the New Development Bank: Mutual interests and first‐mover advantages," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 398-404, May.
    12. Eugenia Baroncelli, 2021. "Cooperating Through Competition: EU Challenge and Support to the World Bank Focality in Multilateral Development Finance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(S4), pages 80-89, May.
    13. Hongying Wang, 2019. "The New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: China's Ambiguous Approach to Global Financial Governance," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 50(1), pages 221-244, January.
    14. Hai Yang, 2023. "Rhetorical coercion, institutional legitimacy and the creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 730-741, November.
    15. Laerte Apolinário Júnior & Felipe Jukemura, 2022. "A comparative analysis of the environmental and social policies of the AIIB and World Bank," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 694-709, November.
    16. Salvatore Babones & John H.S. Åberg & Obert Hodzi, 2020. "China's Role in Global Development Finance: China Challenge or Business as Usual?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 11(3), pages 326-335, May.
    17. Schclarek, Alfredo & Xu, Jiajun, 2022. "Exchange rate and balance of payment crisis risks in the global development finance architecture," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:443-450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.