IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v31y2024i5p2095-2112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business as usual is not working for women in business schools: Student perceptions of business people and entrepreneurs

Author

Listed:
  • Amber N. W. Raile
  • Agnieszka Kwapisz
  • Virginia K. Bratton
  • Myleen Leary
  • Kregg Aytes
  • Laura J. Black
  • Scott E. Bryant

Abstract

Despite growth in the number of women pursuing business and entrepreneurship careers, dominance of masculine traits associated with these occupations persists. If business schools use language that subconsciously reinforces gendered stereotypes, students might perpetuate sexist expectations. Using a natural language text processing tool to analyze the written responses of 247 undergraduate students in a US‐based university, we found that student perceptions of entrepreneurs are associated with more masculine characteristics compared to student perceptions of business people. To some degree, female students were more likely to make these associations than male students. Our findings suggest that business schools must do their part to break the cycles that elevate masculine characteristics of entrepreneurship. The negative effects of this manifest in the persistent gender pay gap, rising but still minority numbers of women entrepreneurs, continued practices of rewarding masculine traits in organizations, and ongoing underrepresentation of women students in schools of business.

Suggested Citation

  • Amber N. W. Raile & Agnieszka Kwapisz & Virginia K. Bratton & Myleen Leary & Kregg Aytes & Laura J. Black & Scott E. Bryant, 2024. "Business as usual is not working for women in business schools: Student perceptions of business people and entrepreneurs," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2095-2112, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:2095-2112
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:31:y:2024:i:5:p:2095-2112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.