IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021is1p243-249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The differential impact of COVID‐19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown

Author

Listed:
  • T. Murat Yildirim
  • Hande Eslen‐Ziya

Abstract

That the COVID‐19 pandemic has affected the work conditions of large segments of society is in no doubt. A growing body of journalistic accounts raised the possibility that the lockdown caused by the pandemic has affected women and men in different ways, due mostly to the traditionally gendered division of labour in society. We attempt to test this oft‐cited argument by conducting an original survey with nearly 200 academics. Specifically, we explore the extent to which the effect of the lockdown on childcare, housework and home‐office environment varies across women and men. Our results show that a number of factors are associated with the effect of the lockdown on the work conditions of academics at home, including gender, having children, perceived threat from COVID‐19 and satisfaction with the work environment. We also show that having children disproportionately affects women in terms of the amount of housework during the lockdown.

Suggested Citation

  • T. Murat Yildirim & Hande Eslen‐Ziya, 2021. "The differential impact of COVID‐19 on the work conditions of women and men academics during the lockdown," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S1), pages 243-249, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:s1:p:243-249
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Thébaud & Charlotte Hoppen & Jennifer David & Eileen Boris, 2024. "Understanding Gender Disparities in Caregiving, Stress, and Perceptions of Institutional Support among Faculty during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Fiaschi, Davide & Tealdi, Cristina, 2023. "The attachment of adult women to the Italian labour market in the shadow of COVID-19," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Anna Carreri & Manuela Naldini & Alessia Tuselli, 2024. "Inequalities in Academic Work during COVID-19: The Intersection of Gender, Class, and Individuals’ Life-Course Stage," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Crowley-Henry Marian & Coogan Kim Margaret & Redmond Cora & Sheil Niall, 2021. "Tales from the Irish diaspora during COVID-19: Prompting a future research agenda for global mobility," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 40(2), pages 157-172, December.
    5. Fiaschi, Davide & Tealdi, Cristina, 2022. "Scarring Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Italian Labour Market," IZA Discussion Papers 15102, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Pınar E. Dönmez, 2022. "The COVID-19 Pandemic, Academia, Gender, and Beyond: A Review," Publications, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, September.
    7. Lakshmi Balachandran Nair, 2024. "Mrs. Dalloway and the Shecession: The Interconnectedness and Intersectionalities of Care Ethics and Social Time During the Pandemic," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(1), pages 1-18, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:s1:p:243-249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.