IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v23y2016i2p89-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Subjectivity of Fairness: Managerial Discretion and Work–Life Balance

Author

Listed:
  • Gwen Daverth
  • Catherine Cassell
  • Paula Hyde

Abstract

type="main"> We use organizational justice theory to examine how perceptions of fairness affect the decision-making process of line managers. In-depth interviews were conducted with 35 Irish managers to explore how managers make organizational allocation decisions in cases where it is impractical to offer work–life balance accommodations to all employees. The findings suggest that firstly, managers construct the ‘life’ aspect of work–life balance within a heteronormative framework, where the emphasis is on caregiving and most usually parenting. Secondly, managers actively use their decision-making powers around both formal and informal work–life balance supports to minimize injustice within their departments. By bringing together ideas about organizational justice and managerial decision-making, we indicate how managers determine fairness through a decision-making process narrowed by embedded gender role beliefs. Implications for future research and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gwen Daverth & Catherine Cassell & Paula Hyde, 2016. "The Subjectivity of Fairness: Managerial Discretion and Work–Life Balance," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(2), pages 89-107, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:89-107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/gwao.12113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackie Ford & David Collinson, 2011. "In search of the perfect manager? Work-life balance and managerial work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(2), pages 257-273, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davlembayeva, Dinara & Papagiannidis, Savvas & Alamanos, Eleftherios, 2021. "Sharing economy platforms: An equity theory perspective on reciprocity and commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 151-166.
    2. Zheng-Dong Li & Bei Zhang, 2023. "Family-friendly policy evolution: a bibliometric study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Nathalie Amstutz & Melanie Nussbaumer & Hanna Vöhringer, 2021. "Disciplined discourses: The logic of appropriateness in discourses on organizational gender equality policies," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 215-230, January.
    4. Ayesha Masood & Muhammad Azfar Nisar, 2020. "Crushed between two stones: Competing institutional logics in the implementation of maternity leave policies in Pakistan," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 1103-1126, November.
    5. Clotilde Coron, 2021. "How perceived managerial behaviors influence employees’ perception of gender equality: the case of a French organization [L’influence des comportements managériaux perçus sur la perception de l’éga," Post-Print halshs-02879960, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Wheatley & Zhongmin Wu, 2014. "Dual careers, time-use and satisfaction levels: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(5), pages 443-464, September.
    2. Suvi Heikkinen & Anna‐Maija Lämsä, 2017. "Narratives of Spousal Support for the Careers of Men in Managerial Posts," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 171-193, March.
    3. Jürgen Mühlbacher & Tom Siebenaler, 2018. "Ready for Changes? The Influence of General Self-Efficacy and Resistance to Change on Managers' Future Competence Requirements," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 4(2), pages 126-142.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:23:y:2016:i:2:p:89-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.