IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v53y2018i1p185-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploiting the “Win But Does Not Cover†Phenomenon in College Basketball

Author

Listed:
  • Jason P. Berkowitz
  • Craig A. Depken II
  • John M. Gandar

Abstract

Wolfers (2006) was the first to document that heavy favorites in college basketball win but fail to cover the pre†game point spread at a statistically higher rate than expected. We generate a hedged strategy to exploit the “win but does not cover†phenomenon using two wagers: a bet on the underdog sides line and a bet on the favorite money line. While one bet is guaranteed to win regardless of the outcome, both bets win if the favorite wins but does not cover. We show that the minimum†variance portfolio best exploits this anomaly, yielding an average return of 0.34% per game and a positive return in five of the seven seasons of college basketball analyzed.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason P. Berkowitz & Craig A. Depken II & John M. Gandar, 2018. "Exploiting the “Win But Does Not Cover†Phenomenon in College Basketball," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 53(1), pages 185-204, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:53:y:2018:i:1:p:185-204
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.12155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12155
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.12155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Borghesi, Richard & Paul, Rodney & Weinbach, Andrew, 2024. "Point shaving? A novel experiment and new insights," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:53:y:2018:i:1:p:185-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.