IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v34y1999i2p89-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Examination of Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock

Author

Listed:
  • Huckins, Nancy White

Abstract

I investigate the determinants of the use of mandatorily convertible preferred stock and assess market reaction to its issue. The security is dividend enhanced and converted into common stock within four years. Issuers have high debt ratios, low interest coverage, and bankruptcy risk. Market response to the issue was neutral suggesting the preferred issue resolved the lemon problem associated with common stock. Firms' Z-scores and abnormal returns are inversely related indicating the issues reduced financial distress. Market response was most positive for low risk firms with high cash flows. Copyright 1999 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Huckins, Nancy White, 1999. "An Examination of Mandatorily Convertible Preferred Stock," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 34(2), pages 89-108, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:34:y:1999:i:2:p:89-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jonathan A. Batten & Karren Lee-Hwei Khaw & Martin R. Young, 2014. "Convertible Bond Pricing Models," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 775-803, December.
    2. Kenneth A. Carow & Valentina Salotti, 2014. "The U.S. Treasury'S Capital Purchase Program: Treasury'S Selectivity And Market Returns Across Weak And Healthy Banks," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 37(2), pages 211-241, June.
    3. Kallberg, Jarl & Liu, Crocker H. & Villupuram, Sriram, 2013. "Preferred stock: Some insights into capital structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 77-86.
    4. An Yan & Debarshi Nandy & Thomas Chemmanur, 2004. "Why Issue Mandatory Convertibles? Theory and Empirical Evidence," Econometric Society 2004 North American Winter Meetings 456, Econometric Society.
    5. Angel Huerga & Carlos Rodríguez-Monroy, 2019. "Mandatory Convertible Notes as a Sustainable Corporate Finance Instrument," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:34:y:1999:i:2:p:89-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.