IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v19y2020i2p45-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management and its Role in Enhancing Perceived Resilience Capacities of Farms and Farming Systems in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Alisa Spiegel
  • Bárbara Soriano
  • Yann de Mey
  • Thomas Slijper
  • Julie Urquhart
  • Isabel Bardají
  • Mauro Vigani
  • Simone Severini
  • Miranda Meuwissen

Abstract

In facing future challenges, risk management (RM) is essential for European farming systems (FS). This article synthesises lessons learned on RM based on a farm survey, interviews with farmers, and focus groups involving a range of FS actors. In contrast to previous literature, we broaden the definition of RM to include strategies that target long‐term structural challenges, as well as expanding the level of analysis from the farm to the FS level. The results were consistent across the different methods. We found that farmers mainly worry about economic challenges: in particular long‐term pressures. We also found that European farmers have implemented diverse RM strategies in the past five years, and that no single strategy has been applied by the vast majority of farmers. In line with perceptions of future challenges, there is a demand for the reorientation of RM strategies towards long‐term pressures, rather than short‐term shocks. FS actors were found to perceive RM as enhancing resilience capacities, especially adaptability. The results of interviews distinguished between major learning strategies and the attributes of farmers for enhancing robustness, adaptive or transformative capacities. Focus group discussions revealed that the future development of RM strategies requires contributions by all FS actors. Pour faire face aux défis futurs, la gestion des risques est essentielle pour les systèmes agricoles européens. Cet article synthétise les enseignements pour la gestion des risques tirés d'une enquête agricole, d'entretiens avec des agriculteurs et de groupes de discussion impliquant un éventail d'acteurs du système agricole. Contrairement aux études déjà publiées, nous élargissons la définition de la gestion des risques, pour inclure des stratégies qui ciblent les défis structurels à long terme, ainsi que le niveau d'analyse, de la ferme au système agricole. Les résultats des différentes méthodes sont cohérents. Nous avons constaté que les agriculteurs se préoccupent principalement des défis économiques : en particulier les pressions à long terme. Nous avons également constaté que les agriculteurs européens ont mis en œuvre diverses stratégies de gestion des risques au cours des cinq dernières années et qu'aucune stratégie n'a été appliquée par la grande majorité des agriculteurs. Conformément à la perception des défis futurs, il existe une demande de réorientation des stratégies de gestion des risques vers des pressions à long terme plutôt que vers des chocs à court terme. Il a été constaté que les acteurs du système agricole considèrent que la gestion des risques améliore les capacités de résilience, en particulier l'adaptabilité. Les résultats des entretiens ont établi une distinction entre les principales stratégies d'apprentissage et les attributs des agriculteurs pour améliorer la robustesse, et les capacités d'adaptation ou de transformation. Les échanges au sein des groupes de discussion ont révélé que le développement futur des stratégies de gestion des risques nécessite la contribution de tous les acteurs du système agricole. Bei der Bewältigung künftiger Herausforderungen spielt das Risikomanagement (RM) für die europäischen Agrarsysteme (FS) eine wichtige Rolle. Diese Untersuchung fasst die Erkenntnisse über das RM zusammen, die auf einer Betriebserhebung, Interviews mit Landwirtinnen und Landwirten sowie Fokusgruppen mit einer Reihe von Beteiligten des FS basieren. Im Gegensatz zu früherer Literatur erweitern wir die Definition von RM um Strategien, die auf langfristige strukturelle Herausforderungen abzielen. Darüber hinaus weiten wir die Analyseebene vom landwirtschaftlichen Betrieb auf die Ebene der FS aus. Die Ergebnisse stellten sich bei den unterschiedlichen angewandten Methoden als konsistent heraus. Wir haben entdeckt, dass sich die landwirtschaftlichen Betriebe hauptsächlich um wirtschaftliche Schwierigkeiten sorgen. Dies betrifft insbesondere langfristige Belastungen. Wir haben ebenfalls festgestellt, dass die europäischen Landwirtinnen und Landwirte in den letzten fünf Jahren verschiedene RM‐Strategien eingeführt haben und dass die überwiegende Mehrheit von ihnen keine einzige Strategie angewendet hat. In Übereinstimmung mit der Einschätzung über die zukünftigen Herausforderungen wird eine Neuausrichtung der RM‐Strategien auf langfristige Belastungen anstatt auf kurzfristige Krisen gefordert. Einem weiteren Ergebnis zufolge sehen die Beteiligten des FS im RM eine Verbesserung der Belastbarkeitskapazitäten, insbesondere der Anpassungsfähigkeit. In den Ergebnissen der Interviews wurde zwischen wichtigen Lernstrategien und den Eigenschaften der Landwirtinnen und Landwirte unterschieden, die die Stabilität, die Anpassungs‐ oder die Transformationskapazitäten verbessern. Die Fokusgruppendiskussionen zeigten, dass die zukünftige Entwicklung von RM‐Strategien Beiträge aller FS‐Beteiligten erfordert.

Suggested Citation

  • Alisa Spiegel & Bárbara Soriano & Yann de Mey & Thomas Slijper & Julie Urquhart & Isabel Bardají & Mauro Vigani & Simone Severini & Miranda Meuwissen, 2020. "Risk Management and its Role in Enhancing Perceived Resilience Capacities of Farms and Farming Systems in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 45-53, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:45-53
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12284
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12284?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Feindt, Peter H. & Spiegel, Alisa & Termeer, Catrien J.A.M. & Mathijs, Erik & Mey, Yann de & Finger, Robert & Balmann, Alfons & Wauters, Erwin & Urquhart, Julie & Vigani, Mau, 2019. "A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio, 2024. "The farm succession effect on farmers’ management choices," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Shingo Yoshida & Hironori Yagi, 2021. "Long-Term Development of Urban Agriculture: Resilience and Sustainability of Farmers Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Willemijn Vroege & Robert Finger, 2020. "Insuring Weather Risks in European Agriculture," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 54-62, August.
    4. Spiegel, Alisa & Slijper, Thomas & de Mey, Yann & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Rommel, Jens & Hansson, Helena & Vigani, Mauro & Soriano, Bárbara & Wauters, Erwin & Appel, Franzisk, 2021. "Resilience capacities as perceived by European farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Soriano, Bárbara & Garrido, Alberto & Bertolozzi-Caredio, Daniele & Accatino, Francesco & Antonioli, Federico & Krupin, Vitaliy & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Ollendorf, Franziska & Rommel, Jens & Spiege, 2023. "Actors and their roles for improving resilience of farming systems in Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 98, pages 134-146.
    6. Feindt, Peter H. & Meuwissen, Miranda P. M. & Balmann, Alfons & Finger, Robert & Mathijs, Erik & Paas, Wim & Soriano, Bárbara & Spiegel, Alisa & Urquhart, Julie & Reidsma, Pytrik, 2022. "Understanding and addressing the resilience crisis of Europe’s farming systems: A synthesis of the findings from the SURE-Farm project," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 342-374.
    7. Angelo Frascarelli & Simone Del Sarto & Giada Mastandrea, 2021. "A New Tool for Covering Risk in Agriculture: The Revenue Insurance Policy," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-16, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blazquez-Soriano, Amparo & Ramos-Sandoval, Rosmery, 2022. "Information transfer as a tool to improve the resilience of farmers against the effects of climate change: The case of the Peruvian National Agrarian Innovation System," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    2. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    4. Meuwissen, Miranda & Feindt, Peter & Slijper, Thomas & Spiegel, Alisa & Finger, Robert & de Mey, Yann & Paas, Wim & Termeer, Katrien & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Peneva, Mariya & Urquhart, Julie & Vigani, 2021. "Impact of Covid-19 on farming systems in Europe through the lens of resilience thinking," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 191.
    5. Daniel Kangogo & Domenico Dentoni & Jos Bijman, 2020. "Determinants of Farm Resilience to Climate Change: The Role of Farmer Entrepreneurship and Value Chain Collaborations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Nele Lohrum & Morten Graversgaard & Chris Kjeldsen, 2021. "Historical Transition of a Farming System towards Industrialization: A Danish Agricultural Case Study Comparing Sustainability in the 1840s and 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Thomas Slijper & Yann de Mey & P Marijn Poortvliet & Miranda P M Meuwissen, 2022. "Quantifying the resilience of European farms using FADN," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 121-150.
    8. Willemijn Vroege & Robert Finger, 2020. "Insuring Weather Risks in European Agriculture," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 54-62, August.
    9. Meuwissen, Miranda P. M. & Feindt, Peter H. & Spiegel, Alisa & Paas, Wim & Soriano, Bárbara & Mathijs, Erik & Balmann, Alfons & Urquhart, Julie & Kopainsky, Birgit & Garrido, Alberto & Reidsma, Pytrik, 2022. "SURE-Farm approach to assess the resilience of European farming systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 1-17.
    10. Mukesh Kumar & Rakesh D. Raut & Mahak Sharma & Vikas Kumar Choubey & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2022. "Enablers for resilience and pandemic preparedness in food supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1198-1223, December.
    11. Goswami, Rupak & Roy, Kalyan & Dutta, Sudarshan & Ray, Krishnendu & Sarkar, Sukamal & Brahmachari, Koushik & Nanda, Manoj Kr. & Mainuddin, Mohammed & Banerjee, Hirak & Timsina, Jagadish & Majumdar, Ka, 2021. "Multi-faceted impact and outcome of COVID-19 on smallholder agricultural systems: Integrating qualitative research and fuzzy cognitive mapping to explore resilient strategies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    12. Darnhofer, Ika, 2021. "Resilience or how do we enable agricultural systems to ride the waves of unexpected change?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Hannington Jawoko Odongo & Alfonse Opio & Adrian Mwesigye & Rogers Bariyo, 2023. "Contribution of Pluralistic Agriculture Extension Service Provision to Smallholder Farmer Resilience," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(6), pages 1-79, November.
    14. Agata Malak-Rawlikowska & Monika Gębska & Robert Hoste & Christine Leeb & Claudio Montanari & Michael Wallace & Kees de Roest, 2021. "Developing a Methodology for Aggregated Assessment of the Economic Sustainability of Pig Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-25, March.
    15. Huet, E.K. & Adam, M. & Giller, K.E. & Descheemaeker, K., 2020. "Diversity in perception and management of farming risks in southern Mali," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    16. Edens, Bram & Maes, Joachim & Hein, Lars & Obst, Carl & Siikamaki, Juha & Schenau, Sjoerd & Javorsek, Marko & Chow, Julian & Chan, Jessica Ying & Steurer, Anton & Alfieri, Alessandra, 2022. "Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Adhikari, Jagannath & Timsina, Jagadish & Khadka, Sarba Raj & Ghale, Yamuna & Ojha, Hemant, 2021. "COVID-19 impacts on agriculture and food systems in Nepal: Implications for SDGs," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Perrin, Augustine & Martin, Guillaume, 2021. "Resilience of French organic dairy cattle farms and supply chains to the Covid-19 pandemic," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Florence A. Becot & Shoshanah M. Inwood, 2022. "Medical economic vulnerability: a next step in expanding the farm resilience scholarship," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 1097-1116, September.
    20. Chris McPhee & Margaret Bancerz & Muriel Mambrini-Doudet & François Chrétien & Christian Huyghe & Javier Gracia-Garza, 2021. "The Defining Characteristics of Agroecosystem Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:19:y:2020:i:2:p:45-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.