IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/etrans/v8y2000i2p369-399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Post‐Communist Health Spending Unusual?

Author

Listed:
  • János Kornai
  • John McHale

Abstract

What factors determine a country's spending on health? And what factors determine the share of spending financed by the public sector? Taking these factors into account, is post‐communist health spending unusual? For the OECD economies, we find that per capita health spending is strongly related to per capita income, with an elasticity of about 1.5. The elasticity for developing economies is close to one. Spending is also positively related to the elderly dependency rate, but the relationship is weaker than a static comparison of spending by the elderly and non‐elderly would suggest. Even though health spending as a share of GDP in the post‐communist countries of eastern and central Europe is below the OECD average, there is evidence of above normal health spending in most countries when we control for income and demographics. For Hungary, the ‘excess’ spending reached over three percentage points of GDP in 1994. For the OECD sample, four development indicators account for half the variation in the public sector share of total health spending. Political variables help explain the remainder. If the post‐communist countries converge to the market economy pattern, the share of public financing will fall, yet still remain well above half.

Suggested Citation

  • János Kornai & John McHale, 2000. "Is Post‐Communist Health Spending Unusual?," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 8(2), pages 369-399, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:etrans:v:8:y:2000:i:2:p:369-399
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-0351.00048
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0351.00048
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-0351.00048?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John McHale, 2001. "The Risk of Social Security Benefit-Rule Changes: Some International Evidence," NBER Chapters, in: Risk Aspects of Investment-Based Social Security Reform, pages 247-290, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Mária Lackó, 2016. "Disparities in Mortality Rates of Working-Age Population in Eastern, Central and Western Europe - A Comparative Quantitative Analysis," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 4, pages 193-213, December.
    3. Dov Chernichovsky, 2001. "A Fuzzy Logic Approach Toward Solving the Analytic Maze of Health System Financing," NBER Working Papers 8470, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Lackó, Mária, 2020. "Korai és időskori halálozások különbségei Európában a 2000-es évek első évtizedében [Disparities in Europes premature and old-age mortality in the first decade of the 2000s]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 957-992.
    5. Lackó, Mária, 2016. "Eltérések a kelet-közép- és a nyugat-európai országok halálozási rátái között. A meghatározó okok kvantitatív elemzése [Differences in death rates between East-Central and Western European countrie," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1324-1347.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:etrans:v:8:y:2000:i:2:p:369-399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ebrdduk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.