IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v63y2010i4p891-914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupational classification in the South African census before ISCO‐58

Author

Listed:
  • A. J. CHRISTOPHER

Abstract

The population census is one of the major statistics gathering exercises undertaken by the state, when information on a wide range of personal attributes is demanded. None is more problematic than occupation, which, for clarity, requires the subsequent simplification and classification of the myriad of self‐descriptions collected. Nowhere is this more evident than in South Africa before 1958. Conflict between British imperial directives and local peculiarities, notably the issue of race, resulted in the adoption of widely fluctuating classification schemes. Consequently, direct comparisons between the published occupational statistics of successive enumerations are highly problematic, if not impossible.

Suggested Citation

  • A. J. Christopher, 2010. "Occupational classification in the South African census before ISCO‐58," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 63(4), pages 891-914, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:63:y:2010:i:4:p:891-914
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00508.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00508.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00508.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward Higgs, 1995. "Occupational censuses and the agricultural workforce in Victorian England and Wales," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 48(4), pages 700-716, November.
    2. Szreter, Simon & Sholkamy, Hania & Dharmalingam, A. (ed.), 2004. "Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199270576.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Madsen, Jakob B., 2019. "Wealth and inequality over eight centuries of British capitalism," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 246-260.
    2. Giulia Mancini, 2018. "Women's Labor Force Participation in Italy, 1861-2011," Rivista di storia economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 3-68.
    3. Miko³aj Szo³tysek & Barbara Zuber-Goldstein, 2009. "Historical family systems and the great european divide: The invention of the slavic east," Demográfia English Edition, Hungarian Demographic Research Institute, vol. 52(5), pages 5-47.
    4. Sarah Walters, 2016. "Counting Souls," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(3), pages 63-108.
    5. Michael Woolcock & Simon Szreter & Vijayendra Rao, 2011. "How and Why Does History Matter for Development Policy?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 70-96.
    6. S. Ryan Johansson, 2010. "Medics, Monarchs and Mortality, 1600-1800: Origins of the Knowledge-Driven Health Transition in Europe," Oxford Economic and Social History Working Papers _085, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    7. S. Ryan Johansson, 2010. "Medics, Monarchs and Mortality, 1600-1800: Origins of the Knowledge-Driven Health Transition in Europe," Economics Series Working Papers Number85, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    8. Dennis Puorideme & Ivan Lind Christensen, 2022. "“Those who eat from one pot”: Constructing household as a social category in a cash transfer programme in Ghana," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 442-460, March.
    9. A. Dharmalingam & S. Morgan, 2004. "Pervasive Muslim-Hindu fertility differences in India," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 41(3), pages 529-545, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:63:y:2010:i:4:p:891-914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.