IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v51y1975i2p253-255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions: A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • J. Kirker Stephens
  • Rothwell Stephens

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Kirker Stephens & Rothwell Stephens, 1975. "Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions: A Comment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 51(2), pages 253-255, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:51:y:1975:i:2:p:253-255
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1975.tb00244.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:ecorec:v:49:y:1973:i:127:p:456-63 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. A. Zellner & N. S. Revankar, 1969. "Generalized Production Functions," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 36(2), pages 241-250.
    3. Herbert H. Tsang, 1973. "Economic Hypotheses and the Derivation of Production Functions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 49(3), pages 456-463, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Barbero & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2022. "Technological, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-332, October.
    2. Peter E. Rossi, 1984. "Stochastic Specification of Cost and Production Relationships," Discussion Papers 616, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    3. Vanhems, Anne & Van Keilegom, Ingrid, 2019. "Estimation Of A Semiparametric Transformation Model In The Presence Of Endogeneity," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 73-110, February.
    4. King, Robert P. & Park, Timothy A., 2002. "Modeling Scale Economies In Supermarket Operations: Incorporating The Impacts Of Store Characteristics And Information Technologies," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19881, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Orea, Luis, 2019. "The Econometric Measurement of Firms’ Efficiency," Efficiency Series Papers 2019/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    6. McDonald, John & Snooks, G. D., 1986. "Domesday Economy: A New Approach to Anglo-Norman History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198285243.
    7. SK Mishra, 2007. "Estimation of Zellner-Revankar Production Function Revisited," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(14), pages 1-7.
    8. Millan, Joaquin, 2004. "Scale and the Efficiency Production Function," Efficiency Series Papers 2004/02, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    9. Constantin Chilarescu, 2019. "A Production Function with Variable Elasticity of Factor Substitution," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(4), pages 2343-2360.
    10. Sakouvogui Kekoura & Shaik Saleem & Doetkott Curt & Magel Rhonda, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis of stochastic frontier analysis models," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 27(1), pages 71-90, March.
    11. Ryu, Hang Keun, 2011. "Subjective model selection rules versus passive model selection rules," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1-2), pages 459-472, January.
    12. Olesen, Ole B., 2014. "A homothetic reference technology in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(3), pages 759-771.
    13. Samb, R. & Heuchenne, C. & Van Keilegom, I., 2011. "Estimation of the error density in a semiparametric transformation model," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2011023, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Benjamin Colling & Cédric Heuchenne & Rawane Samb & Ingrid Van Keilegom, 2015. "Estimation of the error density in a semiparametric transformation model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 67(1), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Olesen, Ole B. & Ruggiero, John, 2012. "Maintaining the Regular Ultra Passum Law in data envelopment analysis," Discussion Papers on Economics 2/2012, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    16. Gaude, Jacques., 1974. "Capital-labour substitution possibilities; a review of empirical research. Provisional," ILO Working Papers 991534603402676, International Labour Organization.
    17. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2007:i:14:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Sundström, David, 2016. "The Competition Effect in a Public Procurement Model: An error-in-variables approach," Umeå Economic Studies 920, Umeå University, Department of Economics, revised 17 Jun 2016.
    19. Seo, Young-Joon & Park, Jin Suk, 2016. "The estimation of minimum efficient scale of the port industry," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 168-175.
    20. Ricardo S. Ehlers, 2011. "Comparison of Bayesian models for production efficiency," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(11), pages 2433-2443, January.
    21. Olesen, Ole B. & Ruggiero, John, 2014. "Maintaining the Regular Ultra Passum Law in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 798-809.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:51:y:1975:i:2:p:253-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.