IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v42y1975i166p182-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Interpretation of Ricardo's Essay on Profits

Author

Listed:
  • Eatwell, John L

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Eatwell, John L, 1975. "The Interpretation of Ricardo's Essay on Profits," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 42(166), pages 182-187, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:42:y:1975:i:166:p:182-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0427%28197505%292%3A42%3A166%3C182%3ATIOREO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-%23&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madarász, Aladár, 2018. "A "túl elméleti" tőzsdeügynök: David Ricardo és az Alapelvek kétszáz éve ["Too theoretical" a stockjobber: 200 years of David Ricardo and his principles]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 449-483.
    2. Salvadori, Neri & Signorino, Rodolfo, 2013. "The Malthus versus Ricardo 1815 Corn Laws Controversy: An appraisal," MPRA Paper 50534, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. André Lapidus, 1996. "Introduction à une "Histoire de la Pensée Economique" qui ne verra jamais le jour," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 47(4), pages 867-892.
    4. André Lapidus & Nathalie Sigot, 2001. "David Ricardo's Contribution to the Constitution of the Canon of Ricardian Economics: A Reconsideration of 1970's Interpretations of the 1815 Debate," Post-Print hal-00344895, HAL.
    5. André Lapidus, 2016. "Pourquoi l'histoire de la pensée économique est-elle différente des autres histoires ? [Почему История Экономической Мысли Отличается От Других Историй?]," Post-Print hal-01619020, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:42:y:1975:i:166:p:182-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.