IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v42y2024i2ne12753.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU Trust Fund for Colombia: Valuable lessons for hybrid peacebuilding

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Madridejos Ornilla

Abstract

Motivation The European Union (EU) Trust Fund has supported the implementation of the 2016 Peace Agreement in Colombia. It represents innovative funding that goes beyond the classic parameters of the so‐called “liberal peace”—that is, imposing a standard formula of guaranteeing security and public order, promoting electoral processes through a party system, and fostering economic openness and free markets. Purpose We analyse the planning, financing, and operational mechanisms of the Trust Fund to identify those elements that encourage or constrain co‐operation for peacebuilding; elements able to integrate and complement the agendas, actors, and dynamics at international, national, and local levels. Methods and approach The article is based on the ongoing support of the Trust Fund for over four years, including an extensive documentary review, participation in numerous events and meetings, and making more than ten field visits to the Fund's intervention areas. More than 50 interviews were conducted with ex‐combatants, local leaders, and representatives of the EU, public institutions, and civil society organizations (CSOs). Findings The Trust Fund has tried to build peace at local and territorial levels. It has proved an assertive and pluralistic instrument, innovating in inter‐institutional co‐ordination, political dialogue, and articulation at the local level. This has not only been visible strategically, but also technically by developing innovations with a high potential for adaptation or scaling up; for example, public access to project progress indicators, the widespread use of third‐party funding to distribute resources to the weakest or most isolated CSOs, and inclusion of the territorial approach in project design and intervention logic. The Fund has been limited, however, by a context in which peacebuilding initiatives have tended to come from central government and donors, rather than from local actors. The government (of President Duque) was reluctant to implement the entirety of its commitments to peace: the EU Delegation was equally reluctant to challenge the government over this. Policy implications The experience of the EU Trust Fund in Colombia can provide valuable ideas to support peace processes elsewhere, to enrich the EU's position and approach to managing and resolving armed conflicts. New instruments, such as the “Team Europe Initiatives” or the “Neighbourhood, Development and International Co‐operation instrument – Global Europe,” focused on multi‐stakeholder co‐ordination and international partnerships, can benefit significantly from lessons learned in Colombia.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Madridejos Ornilla, 2024. "The EU Trust Fund for Colombia: Valuable lessons for hybrid peacebuilding," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:2:n:e12753
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12753
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12753
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12753?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Mac Ginty, 2015. "Where is the local? Critical localism and peacebuilding," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 840-856, May.
    2. Jürgen Howaldt & Peter R.A. Oeij & Steven Dhondt & Ben Fruytier, 2016. "Workplace innovation and social innovation: an introduction," World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Editor, 2016. "Editor's Introduction," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 6(1), July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexandre Polack, 2024. "The European Union's support of the implementation of the peace process in Colombia," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(S3), pages 58-67, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chris Roche & John Cox & Mereani Rokotuibau & Peni Tawake & Yeshe Smith, 2020. "The Characteristics of Locally Led Development in the Pacific," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 136-146.
    2. Viviana García Pinzón, 2023. "Containing Violence in El Salvador: Community Organization, Transnational Networks and State–Society Relations," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(1), pages 192-219, January.
    3. Georgina McAllister & Julia Wright, 2019. "Agroecology as a Practice-Based Tool for Peacebuilding in Fragile Environments? Three Stories from Rural Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, February.
    4. Kassem HAMMOUD, 2018. "Comparative Analysis Of Innovative Forms Of Work Organization At European Level," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(1), pages 367-377, November.
    5. Jol Stoffers & Klaes Eringa & Jamie Niks & Anne Kleefstra, 2021. "Workplace Innovation and Organizational Performance in the Hospitality Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:2:n:e12753. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.