IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v41y2023i6ne12718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How gender mainstreaming plays out in Tanzania's climate‐smart agricultural policy: Isomorphic mimicry of international discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth Smith
  • Anna Mdee
  • Susannah Sallu

Abstract

Motivation Gender mainstreaming is often promoted internationally as the vehicle of choice to achieve gender equality. Concepts of mainstreaming are commonly seen in climate‐smart agriculture (CSA), where it is proposed that they can bridge gender gaps in agricultural input use and productivity. The rhetoric of mainstreaming, however, often relies upon and perpetuates gender myths and assumptions. Purpose We investigate how gender mainstreaming has spread into Tanzania's agricultural policies. We ask whether the government has the capacity to put these concepts into practice to address gender inequality. We explore this in the context of CSA, an increasingly important aspect of agricultural policy. Methods and approach Using the literature on policy transfer and isomorphism, we critically analyse gendered discourse in Tanzania's CSA policies to explore how gender is problematised and governed within policy. We use NVivo 12 to inductively code policy documents. We support these insights with the observations of key informants. Findings We find little evidence that gender has been effectively mainstreamed in Tanzania's CSA policies. We see a gap between the normative goal of gender mainstreaming and the practices intended to address gender (and intersectional) inequalities. The gap is made all the wider by limited recognition within government‐from national to local—of how such inequalities affect agriculture. Not only are policies detached from local contexts leading to infeasible plans, but also local government lacks both resources and capacity to implement them. Policy implications Our study calls into question much of the global discourse on gender mainstreaming, especially the myths that support it. It shows how representing the problem in a particular way can lead to dysfunctional policy. A better approach would be to start with understanding the various inequalities seen in agriculture in Tanzania, inequalities of gender but also of class. It would take into account the capacity to implement policy in the field. A more practical approach, tailored to the realities of rural Tanzania, would benefit the people of Tanzania more than just imitating questionable international discourse.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Smith & Anna Mdee & Susannah Sallu, 2023. "How gender mainstreaming plays out in Tanzania's climate‐smart agricultural policy: Isomorphic mimicry of international discourse," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12718
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12718
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12718
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12718?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sophia Huyer & Samuel Partey, 2020. "Weathering the storm or storming the norms? Moving gender equality forward in climate-resilient agriculture," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Katia Covarrubias & Longin Nsiima & Alberto Zezza, 2012. "Livestock and Livelihoods in Rural Tanzania : A Descriptive Analysis of the 2009 National Panel Survey," World Bank Publications - Reports 17886, The World Bank Group.
    3. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2013. "Escaping Capability Traps Through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 234-244.
    4. Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock & Matt Andrews, 2013. "Looking Like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Cheryl R. Doss, 2018. "Women and agricultural productivity: Reframing the Issues," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(1), pages 35-50, January.
    6. Edidah L. Ampaire & Mariola Acosta & Sofia Huyer & Ritah Kigonya & Perez Muchunguzi & Rebecca Muna & Laurence Jassogne, 2020. "Gender in climate change, agriculture, and natural resource policies: insights from East Africa," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 43-60, January.
    7. Marjorie Mbilinyi, 2016. "Analysing the history of agrarian struggles in Tanzania from a feminist perspective," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(0), pages 115-129, August.
    8. Alvin Chandra & Karen E. McNamara & Paul Dargusch, 2018. "Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 526-541, April.
    9. Anna Mdee & Andrew Mushi, 2021. "Untangling blame and responsibility for service delivery and local governance performance: testing a grounded social accountability approach in Tanzania," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(6), pages 993-1013, November.
    10. Lone Badstue & Cathy Rozel Farnworth & Anya Umantseva & Adelbertus Kamanzi & Lara Roeven, 2021. "Continuity and Change: Performing Gender in Rural Tanzania," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 310-325, February.
    11. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2017. "Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198747482.
    12. Henry Mollel & Albertjan Tollenaar, 2013. "Decentralization in Tanzania: Design and Application in Planning Decisions," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 344-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawson, Andrew & Harris, Jamelia, 2023. "Is the problem driven iterative adaptation approach (PDIA) a panacea for public financial management reform? Evidence from six African countries," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Sayer, Jeffrey & Boedhihartono, Agni Klintuni & Langston, James Douglas & Margules, Chris & Riggs, Rebecca Anne & Sari, Dwi Amalia, 2021. "Governance challenges to landscape restoration in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Matt Andrews & Tim McNaught & Salimah Samji, 2018. "Opening Adaptation Windows onto Public Financial Management Reform Gaps in Mozambique," CID Working Papers 341, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    4. Roll, Michael, 2021. "Institutional change through development assistance: The comparative advantages of political and adaptive approaches," IDOS Discussion Papers 28/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    5. Andrews, Matthew & McNaught, Tim & Samji, Salimah, 2018. "Opening Adaptation Windows onto Public Financial Management Reform Gaps in Mozambique," Working Paper Series rwp18-017, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    6. Evangelia Balla & Jaap Zevenbergen & Ana Mafalda Madureira & Yola Georgiadou, 2022. "Too Much, Too Soon? The Changes in Greece’s Land Administration Organizations during the Economic Crisis Period 2009 to 2018," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Larson, Greg & Ajak, Peter Biar & Pritchett, Lant, 2013. "South Sudan's Capability Trap: Building a State with Disruptive Innovation," Working Paper Series rwp13-041, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    8. Andrews, Matt, 2014. "Can one retell a Mozambican reform story through problem-driven iterative adaptation?," WIDER Working Paper Series 094, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    9. Ricks, Jacob I. & Doner, Richard F., 2021. "Getting institutions right: Matching institutional capacities to developmental tasks," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Jeremy Streatfeild, 2017. "Does This Road Go on Forever? Modelling Sustainability of Infrastructure in Developing Countries," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 9(2), pages 69-81, December.
    11. Hoey, Lesli, 2017. "Reclaiming the Authority to Plan: How the Legacy of Structural Adjustment Affected Bolivia’s Effort to Recentralize Nutrition Planning," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 100-112.
    12. Matt Andrews, 2014. "Can One Retell a Mozambican Reform Story Through Problem-Driven Iterative Adaptation?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-094, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Matt Andrews, 2013. "Who Really Leads Development?," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2013-092, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Matt Andrews, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," CID Working Papers 281, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    15. Andrews, Matt, 2014. "An Ends-Means Approach to Looking at Governance," Working Paper Series rwp14-022, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    16. Matt Andrews & Lant Pritchett & Michael Woolcock, 2016. "Doing Iterative and Adaptive Work," CID Working Papers 313, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    17. Michael Woolcock, 2014. "Engaging with Fragile and Conflict-Affected States: An Alternative Approach to Theory, Measurement and Practice," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-097, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    18. Lodewijk Smets & Stephen Knack, 2018. "World Bank Policy Lending and the Quality of Public-Sector Governance," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(1), pages 29-54.
    19. Quaresima, Federico, 2019. "Patronage Appointments between Politics and Public Governance: a Review," MPRA Paper 94650, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Thiele, Rainer & Köster, Maximilian & Okoli, Ikechukwu & Rühmann, Friederike, 2018. "African economic development: what role can the G20 Compact play?," IDOS Discussion Papers 3/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:41:y:2023:i:6:n:e12718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.