IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v53y2022i2p308-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing the Blue Economy: Placelessness, Development and Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Celine Germond‐Duret

Abstract

This article examines the wide acceptance and endorsement of the notion of the blue economy. It places the blue economy at the intersection of three discourses: the placelessness of the sea, development and sustainability. These discourses, originating on land, have spread spatially, narratively and normatively to the marine realm — part of a larger process of the normalization of the sea via its inclusion in the dominant model of economic development. The author uses the concept of horizontal reciprocity to illuminate this process of normalization. The blue economy requires and justifies the governance of maritime space; it creates economic and political opportunities and generates knowledge and interventions, leading to the territorialization of the sea. The article therefore concludes with a call for further research to critically assess the connections between macro discourses and local realities, and to address the current challenges facing the oceans.

Suggested Citation

  • Celine Germond‐Duret, 2022. "Framing the Blue Economy: Placelessness, Development and Sustainability," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(2), pages 308-334, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:308-334
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12703
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12703?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luke Fairbanks & Lisa M. Campbell & Noëlle Boucquey & Kevin St. Martin, 2018. "Assembling Enclosure: Reading Marine Spatial Planning for Alternatives," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(1), pages 144-161, January.
    2. Hadjimichael, Maria & Bruggeman, Adriana & Lange, Manfred A., 2014. "Tragedy of the few? A political ecology perspective of the right to the sea: The Cyprus marine aquaculture sector," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 12-19.
    3. Bill Hopwood & Mary Mellor & Geoff O'Brien, 2005. "Sustainable development: mapping different approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(1), pages 38-52.
    4. Kjell A. Brekke, 1997. "Economic Growth and the Environment," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 807.
    5. Frank Alcock, 2008. "Conflicts and Coalitions Within and Across the ENGO Community," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 8(4), pages 66-91, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Málovics, György & Dombi, Judit, 2015. "A növekedésen túl - egy új irányzat hozzájárulása a fenntarthatósági vitához [Beyond growth - the contribution of a new direction to the debate on sustainability]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 200-221.
    2. Luigi Mastronardi & Luca Romagnoli, 2020. "Community-Based Cooperatives: A New Business Model for the Development of Italian Inner Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-13, March.
    3. Marianna Cavallo & Alicia Bugeja Said & José A. Pérez Agúndez, 2023. "Who Is in and Who Is out in Ocean Economies Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Monika Duskova & Marketa Souckova, 2020. "Company and State Performance in Key Enabling Technologies — Case Study of Nanotechnology Industry," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Jianguo Du & Francis Tang Dabuo & Beverlley Madzikanda & Kofi Baah Boamah, 2021. "The Influence of R&D in Mining on Sustainable Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Alexey Bilgaev & Suocheng Dong & Fujia Li & Hao Cheng & Erzhena Sadykova & Anna Mikheeva, 2020. "Assessment of the Current Eco-Socio-Economic Situation of the Baikal Region (Russia) from the Perspective of the Green Economy Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Alpizar, Francisco & Carlsson, Fredrik & Johansson-Stenman, Olof, 2005. "How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 405-421, March.
    8. Velasco-Herrejón, Paola & Bauwens, Thomas & Calisto Friant, Martin, 2022. "Challenging dominant sustainability worldviews on the energy transition: Lessons from Indigenous communities in Mexico and a plea for pluriversal technologies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    9. repec:voc:wpaper:tech82012 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Endl, Andreas & Tost, Michael & Hitch, Michael & Moser, Peter & Feiel, Susanne, 2021. "Europe's mining innovation trends and their contribution to the sustainable development goals: Blind spots and strong points," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    12. Xiaojing Zhao & Tengyuan Chang & Bon-Gang Hwang & Xiaopeng Deng, 2017. "Critical Factors Influencing Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    13. Espinoza-Tenorio, Alejandro & Espejel, Ileana & Wolff, Matthias, 2015. "From adoption to implementation? An academic perspective on Sustainable Fisheries Management in a developing country," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 252-260.
    14. Erwin Van Tuijl & Leo Van den Berg, 2016. "Annual City Festivals as Tools for Sustainable Competitiveness: The World Port Days Rotterdam," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13, May.
    15. Fredrik Carlsson & Olof Johansson‐Stenman & Peter Martinsson, 2007. "Do You Enjoy Having More than Others? Survey Evidence of Positional Goods," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 586-598, November.
    16. Chen, Shih-Chih & Hung, Chung-Wen, 2016. "Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 155-163.
    17. repec:ipg:wpaper:13 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Bagdadi Ali & Remenyik Bulcsú, 2021. "The importance of environmental and sustainability education in tourism based on the opinion of students at Budapest Business School," Prosperitas, Budapest Business University, vol. 8(1), pages 4-22.
    19. Julien Vanhulst & Adrian E. Beling, 2013. "Buen vivir: la irrupción de América Latina en el campo gravitacional del desarrollo sostenible," Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 21, pages 1-14, December.
    20. Rudy Laguna Inocente & Álvaro Orozco Ávalos & Madeherick Bejarano Pacheco, 2018. "Mining investment and a fiscal regime that promotes the investment: an inter-temporal model," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 1(01), pages 25-41.
    21. Kazi Abdur Rouf, 2011. "Green microfinance promoting green enterprise development," E3 Journal of Business Management and Economics., E3 Journals, vol. 2(5), pages 183-191.
    22. Gökçer Özgür & Ceyhun Elgin & Adem Y. Elveren, 2021. "Is informality a barrier to sustainable development?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 45-65, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:53:y:2022:i:2:p:308-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.