IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/coecpo/v23y2005i1p91-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Excessive Government Fee Collection in China

Author

Listed:
  • Shuanglin Lin

Abstract

There are several thousand administrative and operating fees, compared to 23 taxes in China. Excessive fee collections are largely targeted at business enterprises and farmers. The growth of fee collection resulted from the increase in the gap between government expenditures and revenues, the self‐collection and self‐utilization policy, and weak law enforcement. Excessive fee collection tends to reduce businesses’investment incentive, aggravate income inequality, breed corruption, and distort the fiscal system. Fee reduction is not possible if the government size and revenue shortage problems of local governments persist. Policy options such as cutting government size are recommended. (JEL H20, H87, P35)

Suggested Citation

  • Shuanglin Lin, 2005. "Excessive Government Fee Collection in China," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 23(1), pages 91-106, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:91-106
    DOI: 10.1093/cep/byi008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byi008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1093/cep/byi008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dick Netzer, 1992. "Differences in Reliance On User Charges By American State and Local Governments," Public Finance Review, , vol. 20(4), pages 499-511, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Yao & Kai Zhao & Xiaoyu Xu & Wenfei Liu, 2022. "Can Corruption Facilitate Industrial Structure Upgrade in China? The Moderating Role of Government-Business Relationships," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
    2. John Tian, 2009. "Reorganizing Rural Public Finance: Reforms and Consequences," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 38(4), pages 145-171.
    3. Wagstaff, Adam & Lindelow, Magnus & Jun, Gao & Ling, Xu & Juncheng, Qian, 2009. "Extending health insurance to the rural population: An impact evaluation of China's new cooperative medical scheme," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Nguyen, Dong Phong & Vo, Xuan Vinh & Anh Tran, Thi Tuan & Thoa Tu, Thi Kim, 2018. "Government cost and firm value: Evidence from Vietnam," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 55-64.
    5. Firth, Michael & Gong, Stephen X. & Shan, Liwei, 2013. "Cost of government and firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 136-152.
    6. Yu Hsing & Wen-Jen Hsieh, 2009. "Currency appreciation, rising financial asset values, and output fluctuations in China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(8), pages 853-857.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Véronique Le Gallo & Nicolas Marceau, 1999. "Intervention Centrale en matière de Finances Locales," CIRANO Project Reports 1999rp-07, CIRANO.
    2. Robert D. Ebel & Yameng Wang, 2018. "User Charges to Fund State and Local Infrastructure Services," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1813, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    3. Tom Downes & Kieran M. Killeen, 2014. "So Slow to Change: The Limited Growth of Nontax Revenues in Public Education Finance, 1991–2010," Education Finance and Policy, MIT Press, vol. 9(4), pages 567-599, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H87 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods
    • P35 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Public Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:coecpo:v:23:y:2005:i:1:p:91-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/weaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.