IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v33y2024i8p7922-7941.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profit first, environmental impact second? Investigating hybrid institutional logics in venture capital investment approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Meike Siefkes
  • Anton Lohne Hamer
  • Gustav Haaland
  • Øyvind Bjørgum

Abstract

Despite a potential mismatch between characteristics of cleantech innovations and the venture capital model, there has been a surge of cleantech venture capital firms (VCs). This paper investigates how cleantech VC investment approaches are aligned with hybrid institutional logics. We mapped 36 European VCs regarding their portfolio firms' industries, technology focus, and level of innovation. From this sample, we interviewed nine VC investors to gain a comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon. The findings show a heterogenous landscape of cleantech VC investment approaches. Cleantech VCs finance mostly incremental innovations in highly emissive sectors. For several of the VCs, the findings highlight a disconnect between the externally communicated cleantech mission and lack of approaches for environmental impact management. We develop propositions for future research. This study adds novel empirical perspectives and contributes to the development of hybrid logics in institutional logics theory with a nuanced examination of the European VC cleantech market.

Suggested Citation

  • Meike Siefkes & Anton Lohne Hamer & Gustav Haaland & Øyvind Bjørgum, 2024. "Profit first, environmental impact second? Investigating hybrid institutional logics in venture capital investment approaches," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 7922-7941, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:7922-7941
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.3902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3902
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.3902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:33:y:2024:i:8:p:7922-7941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.