IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v28y2019i8p1558-1571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of national culture on integrated reporting quality. A stakeholder theory approach

Author

Listed:
  • Filippo Vitolla
  • Nicola Raimo
  • Michele Rubino
  • Antonello Garzoni

Abstract

Integrated reporting (IR) is a new corporate‐reporting system that aims to represent the firm's value creation in the short, medium, and long term. In contrast to other disclosure systems focusing on non‐financial dimensions, including social and environmental aspects, IR is characterized by information connectivity. In recent years, integrated reporting has received increasing interest, both academic and professional. However, report quality is still a critical aspect of IR. Although several studies investigate IR, few focus on quality and its determinants. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the impact of national culture, an external determinant, from a stakeholder theory perspective. The results show that IR quality is related to five dimensions of Hofstede—power distance, individualism, masculinity, and indulgence negatively and uncertainty avoidance positively. This study contributes to the relevant literature by analysing an additional factor that influences the quality of corporate reports, namely, national culture. This is the first study that investigates national culture as a determinant of integrated‐reporting quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino & Antonello Garzoni, 2019. "The impact of national culture on integrated reporting quality. A stakeholder theory approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1558-1571, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:28:y:2019:i:8:p:1558-1571
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.2332
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2332
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.2332?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. José V. Frias‐Aceituno & Lazaro Rodriguez‐Ariza & I.M Garcia‐Sanchez, 2013. "The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(4), pages 219-233, July.
    2. Ole‐Kristian Hope, 2003. "Disclosure Practices, Enforcement of Accounting Standards, and Analysts' Forecast Accuracy: An International Study," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(2), pages 235-272, May.
    3. Kim Hammond & Samantha Miles, 2004. "Assessing quality assessment of corporate social reporting: UK perspectives," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 61-79, March.
    4. René Orij, 2010. "Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(7), pages 868-889, September.
    5. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino, 2019. "Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 518-528, March.
    6. Torbjörn Tagesson & Veronica Blank & Pernilla Broberg & Sven‐Olof Collin, 2009. "What explains the extent and content of social and environmental disclosures on corporate websites: a study of social and environmental reporting in Swedish listed corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(6), pages 352-364, November.
    7. Carol Adams & Nongnooch Kuasirikun, 2000. "A comparative analysis of corporate reporting on ethical issues by UK and German chemical and pharmaceutical companies," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 53-79.
    8. Neu, D. & Warsame, H. & Pedwell, K., 1998. "Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 265-282, April.
    9. Archambault, Jeffrey J. & Archambault, Marie E., 2003. "A multinational test of determinants of corporate disclosure," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 173-194.
    10. Anna Pistoni & Lucrezia Songini & Francesco Bavagnoli, 2018. "Integrated Reporting Quality: An Empirical Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 489-507, July.
    11. Alessandro Lai & Gaia Melloni & Riccardo Stacchezzini, 2016. "Corporate Sustainable Development: is ‘Integrated Reporting’ a Legitimation Strategy?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 165-177, March.
    12. Imhoff, Eugene Jr., 1992. "The relation between perceived accounting quality and economic characteristics of the firm," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 97-118.
    13. Giovanni Garegnani & Emilia Merlotti & Angeloantonio Russo, 2015. "Scoring Firms’ Codes of Ethics: An Explorative Study of Quality Drivers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(4), pages 541-557, February.
    14. Barth, Mary E. & Cahan, Steven F. & Chen, Li & Venter, Elmar R., 2017. "The Economic Consequences Associated with Integrated Report Quality: Capital Market and Real Effects," Research Papers 3546, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    15. Deegan, Craig & Blomquist, Christopher, 2006. "Stakeholder influence on corporate reporting: An exploration of the interaction between WWF-Australia and the Australian minerals industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 343-372.
    16. Hoon Park & Clifford Russell & Junsoo Lee, 2007. "National culture and environmental sustainability: A cross-national analysis," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 31(1), pages 104-121, March.
    17. Silvia Romero & Belen Fernandez-Feijoo, 2013. "Effect of Hofstede’s Cultural Differences in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure," International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change (IJISSC), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 68-84, January.
    18. van der Laan Smith, Joyce & Adhikari, Ajay & Tondkar, Rasoul H., 2005. "Exploring differences in social disclosures internationally: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 123-151.
    19. Simona Alfiero & Massimo Cane & Ruggiero Doronzo & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "Determining characteristics of boards adopting Integrated Reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 37-71.
    20. Erlane K. Ghani & Jauharoh Jamal & Evita Puspitasari & Ardi Gunardi, 2018. "Factors influencing integrated reporting practices among Malaysian public listed real property companies: a sustainable development effort," International Journal of Managerial and Financial Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 144-162.
    21. Laura Sierra‐García & Ana Zorio‐Grima & María A. García‐Benau, 2015. "Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Social Responsibility and Integrated Reporting: An Exploratory Study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 286-304, September.
    22. Stephen B Salter & Frederick Niswander, 1995. "Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally: A Test of Gray's [1988] Theory," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 26(2), pages 379-397, June.
    23. Catherine C Langlois & Bodo B Shlegemilch, 1990. "Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 21(4), pages 519-539, December.
    24. Martin Esch & Benedikt Schnellbächer & Andreas Wald, 2019. "Does integrated reporting information influence internal decision making? An experimental study of investment behavior," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 599-610, May.
    25. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2008. "Factors Influencing Social Responsibility Disclosure by Portuguese Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 685-701, December.
    26. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero & María‐Antonia Garcia‐Benau, 2019. "Integrated reporting: The mediating role of the board of directors and investor protection on managerial discretion in munificent environments," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1), pages 29-45, January.
    27. Kittiya Yongvanich & James Guthrie, 2005. "Extended performance reporting: an examination of the Australian mining industry," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 103-119, March.
    28. Laura Mervelskemper & Daniel Streit, 2017. "Enhancing Market Valuation of ESG Performance: Is Integrated Reporting Keeping its Promise?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 536-549, May.
    29. Bustamante, Silke, 2011. "Localization vs. standardization: Global approaches to CSR management in multinational companies," Working Papers 60, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute of Management Berlin (IMB).
    30. Stephan Vachon, 2010. "International operations and sustainable development: Should national culture matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(6), pages 350-361, November/.
    31. Julia Catharina Jensen & Nicola Berg, 2012. "Determinants of Traditional Sustainability Reporting Versus Integrated Reporting. An Institutionalist Approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(5), pages 299-316, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino & Antonello Garzoni, 2019. "How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(6), pages 1591-1606, November.
    2. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino, 2020. "Gli effetti della cultura nazionale sulla qualit? della disclosure del capitale intellettuale nel contesto dell?Integrated Reporting," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2020(1), pages 137-160.
    3. Raimo, Nicola & Zito, Marianna & Caragnano, Alessandra, 2019. "Does national culture affect integrated reporting quality? A focus on GLOBE dimensions," EconStor Conference Papers 199012, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino, 2019. "Appreciations, criticisms, determinants, and effects of integrated reporting: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 518-528, March.
    5. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Arcangelo Marrone & Michele Rubino, 2020. "The role of ownership structure in integrated reporting policies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2238-2250, September.
    6. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    7. Jannik Gerwanski, 2020. "Does it pay off? Integrated reporting and cost of debt: European evidence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2299-2319, September.
    8. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Arcangelo Marrone & Michele Rubino, 2021. "Do audit committee attributes influence integrated reporting quality? An agency theory viewpoint," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 522-534, January.
    9. Nuradhi Kalpani Jayasiri & Sriyalatha Kumarasinghe & Rakesh Pandey, 2023. "12 years of integrated reporting: A review of research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2187-2243, June.
    10. Annika Wahl & Michel Charifzadeh & Fabian Diefenbach, 2020. "Voluntary Adopters of Integrated Reporting – Evidence on Forecast Accuracy and Firm Value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2542-2556, September.
    11. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Archival research on integrated reporting: a systematic review of main drivers and the impact of integrated reporting on firm value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(3), pages 997-1061, September.
    12. Jannik Gerwanski & Othar Kordsachia & Patrick Velte, 2019. "Determinants of materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting: Empirical evidence from an international setting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 750-770, July.
    13. Laura Girella & Paola Rossi & Stefano Zambon, 2019. "Exploring the firm and country determinants of the voluntary adoption of integrated reporting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1323-1340, November.
    14. Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "The quality of nonfinancial voluntary disclosure: A systematic literature network analysis on sustainability reporting and integrated reporting," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Filippo Vitolla & Nicola Raimo & Michele Rubino, 2020. "Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: an agency theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 1152-1163, March.
    16. Vitolla, Filippo & Raimo, Nicola & Rubino, Michele & Garegnani, Giovanni Maria, 2021. "Do cultural differences impact ethical issues? Exploring the relationship between national culture and quality of code of ethics," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    17. Amir Hossain & Sudipta Bose & Abul Shamsuddin, 2023. "Diffusion of integrated reporting, insights and potential avenues for future research," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2503-2555, June.
    18. Mitzi Isabel Cubilla‐Montilla & Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ana Belén Nieto‐Librero & María Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel María García‐Sánchez, 2020. "What companies do not disclose about their environmental policy and what institutional pressures may do to respect," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 1181-1197, May.
    19. Nicola Raimo & Filippo Vitolla & Valentina Minutiello & Arcangelo Marrone & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Readability of integrated reports: Evidence from worldwide adopters," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3), pages 524-534, May.
    20. Balluchi, Federica & Lazzini, Arianna & Torelli, Riccardo, 2020. "Credibility of Environmental Issues in Non-Financial Mandatory Disclosure: Measurement and Determinants," OSF Preprints g73w5, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:28:y:2019:i:8:p:1558-1571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.