IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v20y2011i4p266-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing collective firm behavior: comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI

Author

Listed:
  • Marian Chertow
  • Yuko Miyata

Abstract

Are companies better off acting collectively in sharing resources, such that one company's waste becomes another company's feedstock, or is it strategically preferable to act individually to minimize resource flows? Eleven enterprises on Oahu, HI, were found to be exchanging nine different materials, constituting previously undocumented industrial symbiosis collaboration, anchored by a coal‐fired power plant in the Campbell Industrial Park. The environmental and economic performance of eight companies exchanging six of these materials is assessed based on price and quantity data collected during interviews with the participants. The largest environmental benefits were found to be reduced landfilling and conservation of primary materials, including 40 million gallons of fresh water and approximately 17 800 tons of coal annually. The research finds that symbiotic solutions, when made visible, are often preferable, especially on an island. Indeed, company managers who fail to consider symbiotic solutions for resource issues risk overlooking the most effective strategic options. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Marian Chertow & Yuko Miyata, 2011. "Assessing collective firm behavior: comparing industrial symbiosis with possible alternatives for individual companies in Oahu, HI," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(4), pages 266-280, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:266-280
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.694
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dick van Beers & Albena Bossilkov & Glen Corder & Rene van Berkel, 2007. "Industrial Symbiosis in the Australian Minerals Industry: The Cases of Kwinana and Gladstone," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 55-72, January.
    2. P. J. Deschenes & Marian Chertow, 2004. "An island approach to industrial ecology: towards sustainability in the island context," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 201-217.
    3. Marian R. Chertow, 2007. "“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 11-30, January.
    4. Noel Brings Jacobsen, 2006. "Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 10(1‐2), pages 239-255, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marian R. Chertow & Thomas E. Graedel & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2020. "The Hawaiian Islands: Conceptualizing an Industrial Ecology Holarchic System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Teresa Annunziata Branca & Barbara Fornai & Valentina Colla & Maria Ilaria Pistelli & Eros Luciano Faraci & Filippo Cirilli & Antonius Johannes Schröder, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis and Energy Efficiency in European Process Industries: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-37, August.
    3. Devrim Murat Yazan & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Luca Fraccascia, 2020. "Learning strategic cooperative behavior in industrial symbiosis: A game‐theoretic approach integrated with agent‐based simulation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 2078-2091, July.
    4. Juan Diego Henriques & João Azevedo & Rui Dias & Marco Estrela & Cristina Ascenço & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller, 2022. "Implementing Industrial Symbiosis Incentives: an Applied Assessment Framework for Risk Mitigation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 669-692, June.
    5. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    6. Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Rui Castro & João Azevedo, 2021. "Industrial Symbiosis: A Sectoral Analysis on Enablers and Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Kokoulina, L. & Ermolaeva, L., 2016. "Championing processes and the emergence of industrial symbiosis: Case of Yandex data center in Finland," Working Papers 6446, Graduate School of Management, St. Petersburg State University.
    8. Haiyan Shan & Junliang Yang & Guo Wei, 2019. "Industrial Symbiosis Systems: Promoting Carbon Emission Reduction Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Pauline Deutz & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2015. "From Theory to Practice: Enhancing the Potential Policy Impact of Industrial Ecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-15, February.
    10. Yuxi Dai & Steven Day & Donato Masi & Ismail Gölgeci, 2022. "A synthesised framework of eco‐industrial park transformation and stakeholder interaction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3122-3151, November.
    11. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    12. John Dinwoodie & Sarah Tuck & Harriet Knowles & James Benhin & Mark Sansom, 2012. "Sustainable Development of Maritime Operations in Ports," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(2), pages 111-126, February.
    13. Marian R. Chertow & Koichi S. Kanaoka & Jooyoung Park, 2021. "Tracking the diffusion of industrial symbiosis scholarship using bibliometrics: Comparing across Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 913-931, August.
    14. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & João C. O. Matias, 2019. "Current Status, Emerging Challenges, and Future Prospects of Industrial Symbiosis in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-23, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emilia Faria & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Cristiane Barreto, 2021. "Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Harshini Mallawaarachchi & Gayani Karunasena & Yasangika Sandanayake & Chunlu Liu, 2023. "Conceptualising a Model to Assess the Optimum Water Flow of Industrial Symbiosis (IS)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Ilaria Giannoccaro & Valeria Zaza & Luca Fraccascia, 2023. "Designing regional industrial symbiosis networks: The case of Apulia region," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1475-1514, June.
    4. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Sun, Lu & Li, Hong & Dong, Liang & Fang, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Zhe, 2017. "Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 78-88.
    6. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    7. Anna Rohde-Lütje & Volker Wohlgemuth, 2020. "Recurring Patterns and Blueprints of Industrial Symbioses as Structural Units for an IT Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Alfred Posch & Abhishek Agarwal & Peter Strachan, 2011. "Editorial: Managing Industrial Symbiosis (IS) Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 421-427, November.
    9. Luca Fraccascia & Vahid Yazdanpanah & Guido Capelleveen & Devrim Murat Yazan, 2021. "Energy-based industrial symbiosis: a literature review for circular energy transition," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 4791-4825, April.
    10. Glen D. Corder & Artem Golev & Julian Fyfe & Sarah King, 2014. "The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, March.
    11. Emilia Faria & Cristiane Barreto & Armando Caldeira-Pires & Jorge Alfredo Cerqueira Streit & Patricia Guarnieri, 2023. "Brazilian Circular Economy Pilot Project: Integrating Local Stakeholders’ Perception and Social Context in Industrial Symbiosis Analyses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-28, February.
    12. John Rincón-Moreno & Marta Ormazabal & Maria J. Álvarez & Carmen Jaca, 2020. "Shortcomings of Transforming a Local Circular Economy System through Industrial Symbiosis: A Case Study in Spanish SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Yang Liu & Peng Cheng & Li Hu, 2022. "How do justice and top management beliefs matter in industrial symbiosis collaboration: An exploratory study from China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 891-906, June.
    14. Weslynne S. Ashton, 2011. "Managing Performance Expectations of Industrial Symbiosis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(5), pages 297-309, July.
    15. Zhe Liu & Weslynne S. Ashton & Michelle Adams & Qing Wang & Raymond P. Cote & Tony R. Walker & Lu Sun & Peter Lowitt, 2023. "Diversity in financing and implementation pathways for industrial symbiosis across the globe," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 960-978, January.
    16. Angela Neves & Radu Godina & Susana G. Azevedo & Carina Pimentel & João C.O. Matias, 2019. "The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis: Case Analysis and Main Drivers and Barriers to Its Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-68, December.
    17. Tran Thi Mai Thanh & Do Dieu Huong & Nguyen Duc Long & Nguyen Duy Dat & Mai Thanh Huyen & Hoang Cao Cuong, 2023. "Assessing the Feasibility of Eco-Industrial Parks in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Thang Long II Industrial Park in Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-21, November.
    18. Yuheng Sun & Shaokang Zhang & Yuanhang Li & Jun Ning & Fangtao Liu & Zhengyuan Feng & Hang Fu, 2024. "Evolutionary Characteristics of Industrial Parks from a Carbon Neutrality Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Hua Cui & Changhao Liu & Raymond Côté & Weifeng Liu, 2018. "Understanding the Evolution of Industrial Symbiosis with a System Dynamics Model: A Case Study of Hai Hua Industrial Symbiosis, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Dick van Beers & Klaus Tyrkko & Alessandro Flammini & César Barahona & Christian Susan, 2020. "Results and Lessons Learned from Assessing 50 Industrial Parks in Eight Countries against the International Framework for Eco-Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-33, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:266-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.