IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i3p1624-1634.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Concordance indices with left‐truncated and right‐censored data

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Hartman
  • Sehee Kim
  • Kevin He
  • John D. Kalbfleisch

Abstract

In the context of time‐to‐event analysis, a primary objective is to model the risk of experiencing a particular event in relation to a set of observed predictors. The Concordance Index (C‐Index) is a statistic frequently used in practice to assess how well such models discriminate between various risk levels in a population. However, the properties of conventional C‐Index estimators when applied to left‐truncated time‐to‐event data have not been well studied, despite the fact that left‐truncation is commonly encountered in observational studies. We show that the limiting values of the conventional C‐Index estimators depend on the underlying distribution of truncation times, which is similar to the situation with right‐censoring as discussed in Uno et al. (2011) [On the C‐statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 30(10), 1105–1117]. We develop a new C‐Index estimator based on inverse probability weighting (IPW) that corrects for this limitation, and we generalize this estimator to settings with left‐truncated and right‐censored data. The proposed IPW estimators are highly robust to the underlying truncation distribution and often outperform the conventional methods in terms of bias, mean squared error, and coverage probability. We apply these estimators to evaluate a predictive survival model for mortality among patients with end‐stage renal disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Hartman & Sehee Kim & Kevin He & John D. Kalbfleisch, 2023. "Concordance indices with left‐truncated and right‐censored data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1624-1634, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:1624-1634
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qian, Jing & Betensky, Rebecca A., 2014. "Assumptions regarding right censoring in the presence of left truncation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 12-17.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bella Vakulenko‐Lagun & Jing Qian & Sy Han Chiou & Nancy Wang & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2022. "Nonparametric estimation of the survival distribution under covariate‐induced dependent truncation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1390-1401, December.
    2. Jing Qian & Sy Han Chiou & Rebecca A. Betensky, 2022. "Transformation model based regression with dependently truncated and independently censored data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 395-416, March.
    3. Chyong-Mei Chen & Pao-Sheng Shen, 2018. "Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 250-272, April.
    4. Sam Efromovich & Jufen Chu, 2018. "Hazard rate estimation for left truncated and right censored data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(4), pages 889-917, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:3:p:1624-1634. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.