IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v78y2022i4p1662-1673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample size estimation for cancer randomized trials in the presence of heterogeneous populations

Author

Listed:
  • Derek Dinart
  • Carine Bellera
  • Virginie Rondeau

Abstract

A key issue when designing clinical trials is the estimation of the number of subjects required. Assuming for multicenter trials or biomarker‐stratified designs that the effect size between treatment arms is the same among the whole study population might be inappropriate. Limited work is available for properly determining the sample size for such trials. However, we need to account for both, the heterogeneity of the baseline hazards over clusters or strata but also the heterogeneity of the treatment effects, otherwise sample size estimates might be biased. Most existing methods account for either heterogeneous baseline hazards or treatment effects but they dot not allow to simultaneously account for both sources of variations. This article proposes an approach to calculate sample size formula for clustered or stratified survival data relying on frailty models. Both theoretical derivations and simulation results show the proposed approach can guarantee the desired power in worst case scenarios and is often much more efficient than existing approaches. Application to a real clinical trial designs is also illustrated.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek Dinart & Carine Bellera & Virginie Rondeau, 2022. "Sample size estimation for cancer randomized trials in the presence of heterogeneous populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1662-1673, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:4:p:1662-1673
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13527
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ha, Il Do & Sylvester, Richard & Legrand, Catherine & MacKenzie, Gilbert, 2011. "Frailty modelling for survival data from multi-centre clinical trials," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2011060, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    2. Samuli Ripatti & Juni Palmgren, 2000. "Estimation of Multivariate Frailty Models Using Penalized Partial Likelihood," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1016-1022, December.
    3. Duchateau, Luc & Janssen, Paul & Lindsey, Patrick & Legrand, Catherine & Nguti, Rosemary & Sylvester, Richard, 2002. "The shared frailty model and the power for heterogeneity tests in multicenter trials," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 603-620, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Il Do Ha & Liming Xiang & Mengjiao Peng & Jong-Hyeon Jeong & Youngjo Lee, 2020. "Frailty modelling approaches for semi-competing risks data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 109-133, January.
    2. Abrahantes, Jose Cortinas & Legrand, Catherine & Burzykowski, Tomasz & Janssen, Paul & Ducrocq, Vincent & Duchateau, Luc, 2007. "Comparison of different estimation procedures for proportional hazards model with random effects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(8), pages 3913-3930, May.
    3. Il Do Ha & Maengseok Noh & Youngjo Lee, 2010. "Bias Reduction of Likelihood Estimators in Semiparametric Frailty Models," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 307-320, June.
    4. Guillaume Horny & Dragana Djurdjevic & Bernhard Boockmann & François Laisney, 2008. "Bayesian Estimation of Cox Models with Non-nested Random Effects: an Application to the Ratification Of ILO Conventions by Developing Countries," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 89, pages 193-214.
    5. Goele Massonnet & Paul Janssen & Tomasz Burzykowski, 2008. "Fitting Conditional Survival Models to Meta‐Analytic Data by Using a Transformation Toward Mixed‐Effects Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 834-842, September.
    6. Jing Wang, 2019. "Weighted estimation for multivariate shared frailty models for complex surveys," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 469-479, July.
    7. Gerda Claeskens & Rosemary Nguti & Paul Janssen, 2008. "One-sided tests in shared frailty models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(1), pages 69-82, May.
    8. Wenjing Qi & Andrew S Allen & Yi-Ju Li, 2019. "Family-based association tests for rare variants with censored traits," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:47:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bo-Hong Wu & Hirofumi Michimae & Takeshi Emura, 2020. "Meta-analysis of individual patient data with semi-competing risks under the Weibull joint frailty–copula model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 1525-1552, December.
    11. Mojtaba Ganjali & T. Baghfalaki & D. Berridge, 2014. "A Bayesian Analysis of Unobserved Heterogeneity for Unemployment Duration Data in the Presence of Interval Censoring," International Econometric Review (IER), Econometric Research Association, vol. 6(1), pages 24-41, April.
    12. Djeundje, Viani Biatat & Crook, Jonathan, 2018. "Incorporating heterogeneity and macroeconomic variables into multi-state delinquency models for credit cards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 697-709.
    13. Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne & Coit, David, 2023. "Dependent failure behavior modeling for risk and reliability: A systematic and critical literature review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    14. Richard Tawiah & Geoffrey J. McLachlan & Shu Kay Ng, 2020. "A bivariate joint frailty model with mixture framework for survival analysis of recurrent events with dependent censoring and cure fraction," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 753-766, September.
    15. Rafael Pimentel Maia & Per Madsen & Rodrigo Labouriau, 2014. "Multivariate survival mixed models for genetic analysis of longevity traits," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 1286-1306, June.
    16. Lore Zumeta-Olaskoaga & Maximilian Weigert & Jon Larruskain & Eder Bikandi & Igor Setuain & Josean Lekue & Helmut Küchenhoff & Dae-Jin Lee, 2023. "Prediction of sports injuries in football: a recurrent time-to-event approach using regularized Cox models," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(1), pages 101-126, March.
    17. Munda, Marco & Rotolo, Federico & Legrand, Catherine, 2012. "parfm: Parametric Frailty Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 51(i11).
    18. Lili Wang & Kevin He & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2020. "Penalized survival models for the analysis of alternating recurrent event data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(2), pages 448-459, June.
    19. Yu Liu & Chin-Shang Li, 2023. "A linear spline Cox cure model with its applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 935-954, June.
    20. Yi Li & Louise Ryan, 2002. "Modeling Spatial Survival Data Using Semiparametric Frailty Models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 58(2), pages 287-297, June.
    21. Sai H. Dharmarajan & Douglas E. Schaubel & Rajiv Saran, 2018. "Evaluating center performance in the competing risks setting: Application to outcomes of wait†listed end†stage renal disease patients," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 289-299, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:78:y:2022:i:4:p:1662-1673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.