IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v59y2003i4p1170-1177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Analysis of Noninferiority Trials with a Rate Ratio in Small-Sample Matched-Pair Designs

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan S. F. Chan
  • Nian-Sheng Tang
  • Man-Lai Tang
  • Ping-Shing Chan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan S. F. Chan & Nian-Sheng Tang & Man-Lai Tang & Ping-Shing Chan, 2003. "Statistical Analysis of Noninferiority Trials with a Rate Ratio in Small-Sample Matched-Pair Designs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1170-1177, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:59:y:2003:i:4:p:1170-1177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2003.00134.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Huiqiong & Tian, Guoliang & Tang, Niansheng & Cao, Hongyuan, 2018. "Assessing non-inferiority for incomplete paired-data under non-ignorable missing mechanism," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 69-81.
    2. Tang, Man-Lai & Qiu, Shi-Fang & Poon, Wai-Yin, 2012. "Confidence interval construction for disease prevalence based on partial validation series," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(5), pages 1200-1220.
    3. Arnold Janssen & Stefan Wellek, 2010. "Exact linear rank tests for two‐sample equivalence problems with continuous data," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 64(4), pages 482-504, November.
    4. Chris J. Lloyd, 2008. "A New Exact and More Powerful Unconditional Test of No Treatment Effect from Binary Matched Pairs," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 716-723, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:59:y:2003:i:4:p:1170-1177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.