IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v59y2003i1p43-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposal for a Goodness-of-Fit Test to the Arnason-Schwarz Multisite Capture-Recapture Model

Author

Listed:
  • Roger Pradel
  • Claire M. A. Wintrebert
  • Olivier Gimenez

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Roger Pradel & Claire M. A. Wintrebert & Olivier Gimenez, 2003. "A Proposal for a Goodness-of-Fit Test to the Arnason-Schwarz Multisite Capture-Recapture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 43-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:59:y:2003:i:1:p:43-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1541-0420.00006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anita Jeyam & Rachel S. McCrea & Thomas Bregnballe & Morten Frederiksen & Roger Pradel, 2018. "A Test of Positive Association for Detecting Heterogeneity in Capture for Capture–Recapture Data," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Roger Pradel, 2005. "Multievent: An Extension of Multistate Capture–Recapture Models to Uncertain States," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(2), pages 442-447, June.
    3. Jerome A. Dupuis & Carl James Schwarz, 2007. "A Bayesian Approach to the Multistate Jolly–Seber Capture–Recapture Model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 1015-1022, December.
    4. Rachel S. McCrea & Byron J. T. Morgan & Olivier Gimenez, 2017. "A new strategy for diagnostic model assessment in capture–recapture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(4), pages 815-831, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:59:y:2003:i:1:p:43-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.