IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausecp/v43y2004i1p101-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Errors & Omissions’ in the Reporting of Australia's Cross‐Border Transactions

Author

Listed:
  • Dietrich K. Fausten
  • Brett Pickett

Abstract

The study is motivated by the consideration that large and variable statistical discrepancies in key economic performance data and successive data revisions may distort the conduct of economic policy and its subsequent evaluation. Its specific object is the exploration of the statistical properties of Australia's cross‐border transactions records: the structural stability of reported errors & omissions and the convergence of reported transactions over successive revisions. The major positive findings are that there is only limited evidence of convergence of measured to true magnitudes of cross‐border transactions; that there is robust evidence of structural instability of the balancing item; and that financial sector transactions appear increasingly to constitute the major source of misreporting of balance of payments outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Dietrich K. Fausten & Brett Pickett, 2004. "‘Errors & Omissions’ in the Reporting of Australia's Cross‐Border Transactions," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 101-115, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:43:y:2004:i:1:p:101-115
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00219.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00219.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-8454.2004.00219.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tuck Cheong Tang & Dietrich Fausten, 2008. "Current And Capital Account Interdependence: An Empirical Test," Monash Economics Working Papers 04/08, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    2. Tuck Cheong Tang & Evan Lau, 2008. "An Empirical Investigation On The Sustainability Of Balancing Item Of Balance Of Payment Accounts For Oic Member Countries," Monash Economics Working Papers 31/08, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    3. T Tang, 2009. "Testing for Non-linearity in the Balancing Item of Balance of Payments Accounts: The Case of 20 Industrial Countries," Economic Issues Journal Articles, Economic Issues, vol. 14(2), pages 107-124, September.
    4. Tuck Cheong Tang, 2007. "Sustainability of balancing item of balance of payments accounts: fresh empirical evidence for G7 countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 251-254.
    5. Liung shi Ding & Tuck cheong Tang, 2017. "‘Net Errors and Omissions' of Balance of Payments and Its Sustainability: A Survey of Literature," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2753-2766.
    6. Siranova, Maria & Tiruneh, Menbere Workie & Fisera, Boris, 2021. "Creating the illicit capital flows network in Europe – Do the net errors and omissions follow an economic pattern?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 955-973.
    7. Maria Siranova & Menbere Workie Tiruneh, 2016. "The determinants of errors and omissions in a small and open economy: The case of Slovakia," Working Papers wp73, Institute of Economic Research, Slovak Academy of Sciences, revised 08 Apr 2016.
    8. Siranova, Maria, 2024. "Statistical omissions as the stabilizing factor of net foreign assets in EU countries," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    9. Mei-yin Lin & Hui-hua Wang, 2009. "What Causes the Volatility of the Balancing Item?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 29(4), pages 2738-2748.
    10. Tuck Cheong Tang & Evan Poh Hock Lau, 2007. "An empirical investigation on sustainability of balancing item in Asian countries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 117-123.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausecp:v:43:y:2004:i:1:p:101-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0004-900X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.