IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v29y2019i2p376-394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Influence, Transition Management and the Demand for Carbon Auditing: The Chinese Experience

Author

Listed:
  • Qingliang Tang

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to investigate factors associated with the increase in demand for carbon auditing in China. Based on an analysis of publicly available carbon‐related information and data, the paper documents the large amount of carbon auditing that occurred in the public sector during the period 2009–2013. We find that the creation of carbon institutions and the significant increase in governmental green funding were the main reasons for the emergence of carbon auditing in this period. The change in models of economic development attempting to balance GDP growth and ecosystem protection, in addition to institutional reform, has led carbon auditing from rhetoric to practice. In addition, we show that carbon auditing serves as a tool for the management of transitions and the governance of sustainable socio‐technical and organisational innovation and transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingliang Tang, 2019. "Institutional Influence, Transition Management and the Demand for Carbon Auditing: The Chinese Experience," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 29(2), pages 376-394, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:376-394
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12224
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangyang Wang & Junwei Bai & Jian Xing & Jianfei Shen & Erli Dan & Xinyuan Zheng & Ludan Zhang & Peng Liu & Renchi Feng, 2023. "Operational Efficiency and Debt Cost: The Mediating Effect of Carbon Information Disclosure in Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    2. Fahad Khalid & Juncheng Sun & Jiawei Guo & Mohit Srivastava, 2024. "Green corporate image: Assessing the effects of climate change management practices on corporate reputation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1786-1801, May.
    3. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang & Hanlu Fan & Jamie Ayers, 2023. "Corporate carbon assurance and the quality of carbon disclosure," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(1), pages 657-690, March.
    4. Wang, Minxue & Li, Bo & Song, Dongping, 2024. "The impact of blockchain on restricting the misuse of green loans in a capital-constrained supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 980-996.
    5. Rong He & Le Luo & Abul Shamsuddin & Qingliang Tang, 2022. "Corporate carbon accounting: a literature review of carbon accounting research from the Kyoto Protocol to the Paris Agreement," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(1), pages 261-298, March.
    6. Liu, Junxian & Nie, Song & Lin, Tiantian, 2024. "Government auditing and urban energy efficiency in the context of the digital economy: Evidence from China's Auditing System reform," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    7. Zahra Borghei, 2021. "Carbon disclosure: a systematic literature review," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(4), pages 5255-5280, December.
    8. Lihong Wang & Shaoqing Kang & Hongjun Wu, 2021. "Do Politically Connected Firms Pay Less Toward Environmental Protection? Firm‐level Evidence from Polluting Industries in China," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(2), pages 362-405, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:29:y:2019:i:2:p:376-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.