IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v13y2003i30p48-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Harmonisation of Government Finance Statistics and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

Author

Listed:
  • Don Challen
  • Craig Jeffery

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Don Challen & Craig Jeffery, 2003. "Harmonisation of Government Finance Statistics and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 48-53, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:30:p:48-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2003.tb00400.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.
    2. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 38-50, March.
    3. Allan Barton, 2005. "Issues in Accrual Accounting and Budgeting by Government," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 12(3), pages 211-226.
    4. Don Challen & Craig Jeffery, 2005. "Definition of the Reporting Entity," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 71-78, March.
    5. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:13:y:2003:i:30:p:48-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.