IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v90y2019i2p227-244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating The Costs, Quality, And Value For Money Of Infrastructure Public‐Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Ole HELBY PETERSEN

Abstract

Public‒private partnerships (PPPs) are often promoted as a means to lower the costs and increase the quality and value for money (VfM) of public construction and infrastructure projects. While the increasing capital stock of PPPs warrants evaluation of their performance there has until now been limited systematic assessment of PPP versus conventional public procurement. This article contributes to the literature by presenting the findings of a systematic review of empirical peer‐reviewed studies comparing the costs, quality, and/or VfM of infrastructure PPP projects with conventional public procurement. The international literature suggests that PPPs are on average more costly and provide approximately similar VfM as conventional procurement. The number of empirical evaluations is limited, however, and evidence on the quality of infrastructure facilities is particularly scarce. While infrastructure PPPs continue to proliferate, systematic assessment of their performance is warranted to assist policy‐makers in choosing the procurement method that offers best value for taxpayers, users and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Ole HELBY PETERSEN, 2019. "Evaluating The Costs, Quality, And Value For Money Of Infrastructure Public‐Private Partnerships: A Systematic Literature Review," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 90(2), pages 227-244, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:90:y:2019:i:2:p:227-244
    DOI: 10.1111/apce.12243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12243
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/apce.12243?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anthony E. Boardman & Mark Moore & Aidan Vining, 2020. "Financing and Funding Approaches for Establishment, Governance and Regulatory Oversight of the Canadian Northern Corridor," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 13(25), October.
    2. Erik-Hans Klijn, 2022. "Theories of public-private partnerships," Chapters, in: A Research Agenda for Public–Private Partnerships and the Governance of Infrastructure, chapter 2, pages 33-52, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Sajid Ali & Sadia Muzaffar Bhutta & Sohail Ahmad & Aisha Naz Ansari & Afaq Ahmed & Yasir Qadir, 2024. "PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of public‐private partnerships on educational access and quality of primary and secondary schooling in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), June.
    4. Hanna Kociemska & Boguslaw Poltorak, 2021. "The Influence of Social Impact Bonds on Public–Private Partnership Success: The Case of Higher Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 423-438.
    5. Marques, Rui Cunha, 2021. "Public interest and early termination of PPP contracts. Can fair and reasonable compensations be determined?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    6. Nannan Wang & Minxun Ma, 2021. "Public–private partnership as a tool for sustainable development – What literatures say?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(1), pages 243-258, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:90:y:2019:i:2:p:227-244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.