IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ajecsc/v53y1994i3p303-315.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disseminating Scholarly Output

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Szenberg

Abstract

. Both editors and authors share in the common recognition of the need for improvement in the speed of the publication process. The current practice of exclusive submissions to scholarly journals causes long delays between the dispatch of a manuscript and its appearance in print that impacts adversely on the careers of many young scientists. This policy is unwise, inequitable, and probably contrary to the wishes of the majority of the members of associations. This is one of the editors’ prerogatives that should be relinquished or, at least, modified in order to provide a more workable, salutary, and balanced relationship between author and editor.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Szenberg, 1994. "Disseminating Scholarly Output," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 303-315, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:53:y:1994:i:3:p:303-315
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1536-7150.1994.tb02600.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1994.tb02600.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1994.tb02600.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ofer H. Azar, 2006. "The Academic Review Process: How Can We Make it More Efficient?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 50(1), pages 37-50, March.
    2. Jens Prüfer & David Zetland, 2010. "An auction market for journal articles," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 379-403, December.
    3. Ofer H. Azar, 2005. "The Review Process in Economics: Is It Too Fast?," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 72(2), pages 482-491, October.
    4. Cebula, Richard & Koch, James, 1994. "Disseminating Scholarly Output: A Comment," MPRA Paper 53571, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. JS Armstrong, 2005. "Quality Control Versus Innovation in Research on Marketing," General Economics and Teaching 0502050, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ajecsc:v:53:y:1994:i:3:p:303-315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0002-9246 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.