IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v25y2000i1p13-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring soil quality dynamics A role for economists, and implications for economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kwansoo Kim
  • Bradford L. Barham
  • Ian Coxhead

Abstract

Measuring soil quality is extremely difficult, yet it has clear economic importance. In particular, there is a great deal of empirical interest in the dynamics of soil quality evolution when land managers respond to policies and other incentives. Yet current methodologies for measuring changes in agricultural land quality are largely static and rely heavily either on incomplete measures such as proxy variables, or ad hoc indexes of selected soil characteristics. Moreover, much empirical work relies on static econometric techniques or simulation models. In this paper, we develop a means to infer soil quality changes from input and output data using a dynamic production function model. Using data from field experiments, we estimate the model in a way that allows the recovery of a dynamic measure of soil quality whose evolution depends on variations in management practices. Our methodology and findings will help provide firmer empirical foundations for analyses of the economic implications of land degradation and the soil quality implications of agricultural policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwansoo Kim & Bradford L. Barham & Ian Coxhead, 2000. "Measuring soil quality dynamics A role for economists, and implications for economic analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 25(1), pages 13-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:25:y:2000:i:1:p:13-26
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00232.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00232.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00232.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coxhead, Ian A., 1997. "Induced innovation and land degradation in developing country agriculture," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(3), pages 1-28.
    2. David J. Walker, 1982. "A Damage Function to Evaluate Erosion Control Economics," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(4), pages 690-698.
    3. G. C. Van Kooten & Ward P. Weisensel & Duangdao Chinthammit, 1990. "Valuing Trade-Offs between Net Returns and Stewardship Practices: The Case of Soil Conservation in Saskatchewan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 72(1), pages 104-113.
    4. Kim, Kwansoo & Barham, Bradford L. & Coxhead, Ian, 1997. "The Evolution of Agricultural Soil Quality: A methodology for measurement and some land market implications," Staff Papers 200596, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    5. Swamy, P A V B, 1970. "Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(2), pages 311-323, March.
    6. Joyotee Smith & Gloria Umali, 1985. "Production Risk and Optimal Fertilizer Rates: A Random Coefficient Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 67(3), pages 654-659.
    7. Ali, Mubarik & Byerlee, Derek, 2000. "Productivity growth and resource degradation in Pakistan's Punjab - a decomposition analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2480, The World Bank.
    8. Edward C. Jaenicke & Laura L. Lengnick, 1999. "A Soil-Quality Index and Its Relationship to Efficiency and Productivity Growth Measures: Two Decompositions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 881-893.
    9. Putman, John W. & Dyke, Paul T., 1987. "The Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator as Formulated for the Resource Conservation Act Appraisal," Staff Reports 277924, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    10. Krueger, Anne O & Schiff, Maurice & Valdes, Alberto, 1988. "Agricultural Incentives in Developing Countries: Measuring the Effect of Sectoral and Economywide Policies," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 2(3), pages 255-271, September.
    11. Hertel, Thomas W. & Preckel, Paul V., 1988. "Commodity-Specific Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 40(3), pages 1-10.
    12. Hansen, LeRoy T., 1991. "Farmer Response to Changes in Climate: The Case of Corn Production," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 43(4), pages 1-8.
    13. Oscar R. Burt, 1981. "Farm Level Economics of Soil Conservation in the Palouse Area of the Northwest," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 83-92.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bond, Craig A. & Farzin, Y. Hossein, 2004. "A Portfolio Of Nutrients: Soil And Sustainability," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20035, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. François Bareille & Pierre Dupraz, 2020. "Productive Capacity of Biodiversity: Crop Diversity and Permanent Grasslands in Northwestern France," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(2), pages 365-399, October.
    3. Issanchou, Alice, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers 230002, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    4. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2016. "A dynamic economic model of soil conservation and drought tolerance involving genetically modified crops," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 18(1), pages 40-66, October.
    5. Alice Issanchou, 2016. "Soil resource, at the core of competitiveness and sustainability issues in agriculture: an economic approach," Working Papers SMART 16-01, INRAE UMR SMART.
    6. Bareille, François & Dupraz, Pierre, 2017. "Biodiversity Productive Capacity in Mixed Farms of North-West of France: a Multi-output Primal System," Working Papers 257261, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    7. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers id:6623, eSocialSciences.
    8. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers 2015-096, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    9. Turner, Katrine Grace & Anderson, Sharolyn & Gonzales-Chang, Mauricio & Costanza, Robert & Courville, Sasha & Dalgaard, Tommy & Dominati, Estelle & Kubiszewski, Ida & Ogilvy, Sue & Porfirio, Luciana &, 2016. "A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 190-207.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Kwansoo & Barham, Bradford L. & Coxhead, Ian, 1997. "The Evolution of Agricultural Soil Quality: A methodology for measurement and some land market implications," Staff Papers 200596, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    2. Lakshminarayan, P. G. & Atwood, J. D. & Johnson, Stanley R. & Sposito, V. A., 1991. "Compromise Solution for Economic-Environmental Decisions in Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers Archive 375, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Ian A. COXHEAD, 1995. "Economic Modeling Of Land Degradation In Developing Countries," Staff Papers 385, University of Wisconsin Madison, AAE, revised May 1996.
    4. Hoag, Dana L., 1998. "The intertemporal impact of soil erosion on non-uniform soil profiles: A new direction in analyzing erosion impacts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 415-429, April.
    5. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Debertin, David L. & Sjarkowi, Fachrurrozie, 1987. "Soil Erosion and Yield Uncertainty in the Soil Conservation Decision," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 140066, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    6. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers 2015-096, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    7. Alexander, Robert R. & English, Burton C., 1992. "Modeling Soil Erosion Control Policy: A Multi-Level Dynamic Analysis," 1992 Annual Meeting, August 9-12, Baltimore, Maryland 271375, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Bailey, DeeVon & Helms, Gary L., 1985. "An Analysis Of Alternative Tillage Practices On Non-Irrigated Grain Farms: A Whole-Farm Simulation Approach," 1985 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Ames, Iowa 278648, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Saliba, B. Colby, 1985. "Soil Productivity And Farmers' Erosion Control Incentives--A Dynamic Modeling Approach," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(2), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Amrita Chatterjee & Arpita Ghose, 2015. "A Dynamic Economic Model of Soil Conservation Involving Genetically Modified Crop," Working Papers id:6623, eSocialSciences.
    11. Mullen, John D., 2001. "An Economic Persective On Land Degradation Issues," Research Reports 27999, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    12. Eaton, Derek J.F., 1996. "The Economics of Soil Erosion: A Model of Farm Decision-Making," Discussion Papers 24134, International Institute for Environment and Development, Environmental Economics Programme.
    13. Weisensel, Ward P. & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 1990. "Estimation Of Soil Erosion Time Paths: The Value Of Soil Moisture And Topsoil Depth Information," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-10, July.
    14. Taylor, Daniel B. & Young, Douglas L., 1985. "The Influence Of Technological Progress On The Long Run Farm Level Economics Of Soil Conservation," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Lichtenberg, Erik, 2002. "Agriculture and the environment," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 23, pages 1249-1313, Elsevier.
    16. Wen, Frank Hao & Easter, K. William, 1987. "Erosion And The Loss Of Soil Productivity On The Terril Soil Series In Minnesota," Economic Reports 13051, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    17. Dayakar Peddi & Kavi Kumar, 2019. "Farmer’s Perception on Soil Erosion in Rainfed Watershed Areas of Telangana, India," Working Papers 2019-180, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    18. Schiff, Maurice*Valdes, Alberto, 1998. "Agriculture and the macroeconomy," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1967, The World Bank.
    19. Mariam Camarero & Juan Sapena & Cecilio Tamarit, 2020. "Modelling Time-Varying Parameters in Panel Data State-Space Frameworks: An Application to the Feldstein–Horioka Puzzle," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 56(1), pages 87-114, June.
    20. Catherine Araujo-Bonjean & Gérard Chambas, 2001. "Le paradoxe de la fiscalité agricole en Afrique subsaharienne," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(168), pages 773-788.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:25:y:2000:i:1:p:13-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.