IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v13y1995i2p101-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision support system for strategic planning on pig farms

Author

Listed:
  • G.B.C. Backus
  • G.Th. Timmer
  • A.A. Dijkhuizen
  • V.R. Eidman
  • F. Vos

Abstract

This paper reported on a decision support system (DSS) for strategic planning on pig farms. The DSS was based on a stochastic simulation model of investment decisions (ISM). ISM described a farm with one loan and one building using 23 variables. The simulation model calculated the results of a strategic plan for an individual pig farm over a time horizon of a maximum of 20 years for a given scenario. For six distinct replacement strategies, regression metamodels were specified to describe the outcome of the response variable as a function of the farm variables. The regression results indicated that a linear function with only nine or ten farm variables gave a reasonable estimate of the results of the simulation model. Turnover ratio, feed conversion ratio, percentage of meat, farm size, family expenses, and experience were the main parameters determining future relative farm position. For farms with high levels of family expenditures and/or financial leverage an economic replacement strategy was optimal. Risk attitudes played a minor role in the choice of the optimal strategy, because one strategy was preferred to another regardless of risk preference. To analyze the attractiveness of a chosen strategic plan for different ‘what‐if’ scenarios, the visual method using graphical representations offered sufficient information. The number of years ahead for which the decision maker evaluated the consequences of simulated strategic plans influenced which strategy was preferred.

Suggested Citation

  • G.B.C. Backus & G.Th. Timmer & A.A. Dijkhuizen & V.R. Eidman & F. Vos, 1995. "A decision support system for strategic planning on pig farms," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 101-108, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:13:y:1995:i:2:p:101-108
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00379.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00379.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1995.tb00379.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 1992. "Sensitivity analysis of simulation experiments: regression analysis and statistical design," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 297-315.
    2. Meyer, Jack, 1977. "Choice among distributions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 326-336, April.
    3. John M. Brewster, 1950. "The Machine Process in Agriculture and Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(1), pages 69-81.
    4. Robert P. King & Lindon J. Robison, 1981. "An Interval Approach to Measuring Decision Maker Preferences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(3), pages 510-520.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hardaker, J. Brian & Lien, Gudbrand D., 2003. "Stochastic Efficiency Analysis With Risk Aversion Bounds: A Simplified Approach," Working Papers 12954, University of New England, School of Economics.
    2. Lien, Gudbrand, 2003. "Assisting whole-farm decision-making through stochastic budgeting," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 399-413, May.
    3. Rister, M. Edward & Skees, Jerry R., 1982. "The Value Of Outlook Information In Post-Harvest Marketing Strategies," 1982 Annual Meeting, August 1-4, Logan, Utah 279431, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Drynan, Ross G., 1987. "Sufficient Conditions for Dominance of Simply Related Prospects," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 55(01), pages 1-12, April.
    5. Love, Ross O. & Robison, Lindon J., 1984. "An Empirical Analysis Of The Intertemporal Stability Of Risk Preference," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-7, July.
    6. Marshall, Graham R. & Jones, Randall E. & Wall, Lisa M., 1997. "Tactical Opportunities, Risk Attitude and Choice of Farming Strategy: an Application of the Distribution Method," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(4), pages 1-21.
    7. Musser, Wesley N., 1994. "Progress In Risk Analysis In Regional Projects," 1994 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses Risk, Technical Committee Meeting, March 24-26, 1994, Gulf Shores State Park, Alabama 271553, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    8. Schumann, Keith D. & Richardson, James W. & Lien, Gudbrand D. & Hardaker, J. Brian, 2004. "Stochastic Efficiency Analysis Using Multiple Utility Functions," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19957, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Jock R. Anderson & William E. Griffiths, 1982. "Production Risk And Efficient Allocation Of Resources," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(3), pages 226-232, December.
    10. King, Robert P. & Lybecker, Donald W., 1983. "Flexible, Risk-Oriented Marketing Strategies For Pinto Bean Producers," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Wilson, Paul N. & Hwang, Henry H., 1982. "User'S Guide To Ordinary And Generalized Stochastic Dominance Computer Programs," Staff Papers 13277, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    12. Roach, Brian A. & Hamlett, Cathy A., 1991. "Dairy Farmer's Valuation of Market Security Offered by Milk Marketing Cooperatives," Staff Paper Series 256842, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    13. Anderson, Jock R. & Dillon, John L. & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1985. "Farmers and Risk," 1985 Conference, August 26-September 4, 1985, Malaga, Spain 183026, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Kang, Taehoon & Wade Brorsen, B. & Adam, Brian D., 1996. "A new efficiency criterion: The mean-separated target deviations risk model," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 47-66, February.
    15. J. Brian Hardaker & James W. Richardson & Gudbrand Lien & Keith D. Schumann, 2004. "Stochastic efficiency analysis with risk aversion bounds: a simplified approach," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 253-270, June.
    16. Jourdain, Damien & Scopel, Eric & Affholder, Francois, 2001. "The Impact Of Conservation Tillage On The Productivity And Stability Of Maize Cropping Systems: A Case Study In Western Mexico," Economics Working Papers 46549, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    17. Maynard, Leigh J. & Harper, Jayson K. & Hoffman, Lynn D., 1997. "Impact Of Risk Preferences On Crop Rotation Choice," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 1-9, April.
    18. Scott, R. Douglass, III & Cochran, Mark J. & Nicholson, W.F., Jr., 1986. "Economic Analysis Of Cotton Integrated Pest Management Strategies: A Comment," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-3, July.
    19. Richardson, James W. & Nixon, Clair J., 1982. "Producer'S Preference For A Cotton Farmer Owned Reserve: An Application Of Simulation And Stochastic Dominance," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, July.
    20. Roach, Brian A. & Hamlett, Cathy A., 1991. "Dairy Farmer's Valuation of Decreased Market Risk Offered by Cooperatives," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271240, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:13:y:1995:i:2:p:101-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.