IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v60y2024i4p777-815.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Publication or the Implementation of IAS 19(R) Have Real Economic Consequences?

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Chircop
  • Paraskevi Vicky Kiosse

Abstract

IAS 19 revised (IAS 19(R)) abolished the corridor approach and replaced the expected rate of return (ERR) on pension plan assets with the discount rate. While the abolition of the corridor method did not have a significant impact on UK firms, which were historically using a different method to recognize actuarial gains or losses, the elimination of the ERR was anticipated to have a major impact. We examine whether the elimination of the ERR had real economic consequences for UK firms around the publication and implementation dates of IAS 19(R). Our findings suggest that UK firms shifted pension investments away from equities following the publication and implementation of IAS 19(R). In addition, we find evidence that firms with higher pension deficits and firms that used higher ERRs reduced equity investments to a greater extent following the publication of IAS 19(R); interestingly, firms with larger differences between the expected and actual rates of return on pension plan assets reduced equity investments to a greater extent only following the implementation of IAS 19(R). These findings may be of interest to regulators in the context of standard‐setting, investment professionals, and other stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Chircop & Paraskevi Vicky Kiosse, 2024. "Does the Publication or the Implementation of IAS 19(R) Have Real Economic Consequences?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(4), pages 777-815, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:60:y:2024:i:4:p:777-815
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12330
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12330?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Michael Harrison & William F. Sharpe, 1983. "Optimal Funding and Asset Allocation Rules for Defined-Benefit Pension Plans," NBER Chapters, in: Financial Aspects of the United States Pension System, pages 91-106, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Christian Barthelme & Paraskevi Vicky Kiosse & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2019. "The Impact of Accounting Standards on Pension Investment Decisions," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-33, January.
    3. Yong Li & Paul Klumpes, 2013. "Determinants of expected rate of return on pension assets: evidence from the UK," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 3-30, February.
    4. João F. Cocco & Paolo F. Volpin, 2007. "Corporate Governance of Pension Plans: The U.K. Evidence," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(1), pages 70-83, January.
    5. Daniel Bergstresser & Mihir Desai & Joshua Rauh, 2006. "Earnings Manipulation, Pension Assumptions, and Managerial Investment Decisions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 121(1), pages 157-195.
    6. Joshua D. Rauh, 2009. "Risk Shifting versus Risk Management: Investment Policy in Corporate Pension Plans," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(7), pages 2487-2533, July.
    7. Justin Chircop & Paraskevi Vicky Kiosse, 2015. "Why did preparers lobby to the IASB's pension accounting proposals?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 268-280, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bartram, Söhnke M., 2018. "In good times and in bad: Defined-benefit pensions and corporate financial policy," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 331-351.
    2. Michaelides, Alexander & Papakyriakou, Panayiotis & Milidonis, Andreas, 2019. "Corporate Pension Plan Funding Levels and Pension Assumptions," CEPR Discussion Papers 13591, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Anantharaman, Divya & Chuk, Elizabeth & Kamath, Saipriya, 2024. "A demotion in disguise? The real effects of relocating pension smoothing from operating income to non-operating income," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 124405, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Romaniuk, Katarzyna, 2019. "Premiums of the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation and risk-taking by pension plans," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 301-307.
    5. Kusano, Masaki, 2023. "Does recognition versus disclosure of pension liabilities affect credit ratings? Evidence from Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Goto, Shingo & Yanase, Noriyoshi, 2023. "Corporate governance and shareholder-employee risk-shifting: Evidence from corporate pension plan sponsors," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PA).
    7. Tao, Qizhi & Chen, Carl & Lu, Rui & Zhang, Ting, 2017. "Underfunding or distress? An analysis of corporate pension underfunding and the cross-section of expected stock returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 116-133.
    8. Masaki KUSANO, 2022. "Recognition versus Disclosure and Managerial Discretion: Evidence from Japanese Pension Accounting," Discussion papers e-22-008, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    9. Iqbal Owadally, 2014. "Tail risk in pension funds: an analysis using ARCH models and bilinear processes," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 301-331, August.
    10. F. Wang & Ting Zhang, 2014. "The effect of unfunded pension liabilities on corporate bond ratings, default risk, and recovery rate," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 781-802, November.
    11. Maximilian Konradt, 2023. "Do pension funds reach for yield? Evidence from a new database," IHEID Working Papers 01-2023, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    12. Hieu V. Phan & Shantaram P. Hegde, 2013. "Pension Contributions and Firm Performance: Evidence from Frozen Defined Benefit Plans," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 42(2), pages 373-411, June.
    13. Fahad, Nafiz & Ma, Nelson & Scott, Tom, 2020. "The consequences of discount rate selection for defined benefit liabilities," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    14. Brian Silverstein, 2021. "Defined benefit pension de‐risking and corporate risk‐taking," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(4), pages 1085-1111, December.
    15. Goto, Shingo & Yanase, Noriyoshi, 2021. "Pension return assumptions and shareholder-employee risk-shifting," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Joshua Rauh, 2007. "Risk Shifting versus Risk Management: Investment Policy in Corporate Pension Plans," NBER Working Papers 13240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Luca Larcher & Francis Breedon, 2020. "Discounting and the market valuation of defined benefit pensions," Working Papers 932, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    18. Anantharaman, Divya & Lee, Yong Gyu, 2014. "Managerial risk taking incentives and corporate pension policy," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 328-351.
    19. An, Heng & Huang, Zhaodan & Zhang, Ting, 2013. "What determines corporate pension fund risk-taking strategy?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 597-613.
    20. Anantharaman, Divya & Chuk, Elizabeth & Kamath, Saipriya, 2021. "Location, location, location! Real effects from the mandated removal of pension expected return from operating income," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108931, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:60:y:2024:i:4:p:777-815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.