IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjx/jomwor/v2024y2024i4p524-532id451.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agenda Setting for Food Estate Policy in Multiple Stream Frameworks (MSF) Perspective: Case in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Farid Zaky Yopiannor
  • Abdul Yuli Andi Gani
  • Lely Indah Mindarti
  • Mochamad Rozikin

Abstract

Agenda setting is critical to public policy due to impacts on subsequent policy processes. In 2020, The Indonesian government has issued a food estate policy in response to FAO's warning of a food crisis due to the Covid-19 pandemic. This policy has also been included in the National Strategic Project (PSN) as stipulated through Presidential Regulation No. 109/2020. This policy aims to create new paddy fields in order to maintain national food stock needs, especially rice, by prioritizing intensification and extensification of paddy fields. Now this program has received serious attention and is considered to have failed. The failure of food estates can often be attributed to the lack of community involvement in the planning and implementation of such projects. Applying the multiple streams framework, this study found two agenda setting failures, namely failure to define the problem from policy entrepreneurs and skipping the policy formulation stage. The study recommends revisiting agenda setting and adding participation streams to open up space for deliberation in decision-making through the participation of Dayak customary council institutions through their local wisdom and knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Farid Zaky Yopiannor & Abdul Yuli Andi Gani & Lely Indah Mindarti & Mochamad Rozikin, 2024. "Agenda Setting for Food Estate Policy in Multiple Stream Frameworks (MSF) Perspective: Case in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia," Journal of Management World, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2024(4), pages 524-532.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2024:y:2024:i:4:p:524-532:id:451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/article/view/451/324
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal of Management World
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2024:y:2024:i:4:p:524-532:id:451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.