IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i6p510-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Technologies for Transforming Mosques into Smart Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed, Abubakar Sadiq

    (Estate Management Department/ Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Kibi Presbyterian College of Education and University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

  • Dr. Issah Bala Abdulai

    (Estate Management Department/ Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Kibi Presbyterian College of Education and University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

  • Abbas Jannat

    (Estate Management Department/ Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Kibi Presbyterian College of Education and University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

  • Dzimale Augustine

    (Estate Management Department/ Department of Quantity Surveying and Construction Management, Kibi Presbyterian College of Education and University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa)

Abstract

Purpose – Traditional mosques face inefficiencies in energy use, outdated infrastructure, and inadequate security, all of which lead to high costs and safety concerns. Transforming mosques into smart buildings using emerging technologies can optimize energy consumption, enhance security, improve resource management, promote sustainability and improve user comfort by addressing overcrowding and inadequate facilities. Despite the limited studies on this topic, this systematic literature review aims to explore the current trends in using emerging technologies to transform mosques into smart buildings. Design/Methodology/Approach – The study used Scopus-indexed literature from 2005 to 2024 to investigate the transformation of mosques into smart buildings using emerging technologies. Based on relevance, quality, recency, geographical focus, and diversity of perspectives, the authors selected 43 records from 156. VOSviewer software provided a quantitative overview of trends, while content analysis offered deeper insights by coding and categorizing themes. This combined approach ensured a comprehensive understanding of current practices and advancements in the field. Findings – The study found a significant interest in integrating emerging technologies into building architecture and management, particularly focusing on energy efficiency and user comfort. This interest was reflected in the concentration of studies in countries like the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, China, and Australia. Authors categorized the identified knowledge areas into two main clusters: design and energy-efficient buildings, and technology and intelligent buildings. These clusters represent the dual emphasis on creating energy-efficient structures and incorporating advanced technologies to enhance building intelligence. While the study did not provide specific quantitative results, it highlighted a clear trend towards the adoption of smart building technologies in these key areas, indicating a global shift towards more sustainable and efficient building practices. Practical Implications – Smart building technologies offer significant benefits to practitioners in architecture, facility management, engineering and others such as religious leadres, community members and policy makers, which optimize lighting, heating, cooling, and ventilation, leading to substantial reductions in energy consumption and operational costs. Intelligent design elements such as smart crowd management systems and personalized environmental controls enhance the user experience and satisfaction. The adoption of sustainable materials and renewable energy sources reduces environmental impact, aligning with global sustainability goals. Automated monitoring and predictive maintenance systems improve operational efficiency, reducing downtime and maintenance costs. And alos, smart building technologies enable practitioners to create efficient, sustainable, and user-centric environments, enhancing the quality and performance of buildings such as mosques. Originality/Value – This study provides valuable insights into the current practices and trends in using emerging technologies to transform mosques into smart buildings. While previous studies have explored various aspects of smart buildings and sustainability in different contexts, there is limited research specifically focusing on the transformation of mosques. This study aims to fill this gap by offering insights into the application of smart technologies in mosque architecture and management, highlighting the benefits and challenges associated with this transformation. Examining Scopus-indexed literature and using VOSviewer software for visualization and analysis, this study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on smart buildings and their potential impact on religious and communal structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed, Abubakar Sadiq & Dr. Issah Bala Abdulai & Abbas Jannat & Dzimale Augustine, 2024. "Emerging Technologies for Transforming Mosques into Smart Buildings: A Systematic Literature Review," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(6), pages 510-534, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:6:p:510-534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-6/510-534.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/emerging-technologies-for-transforming-mosques-into-smart-buildings-a-systematic-literature-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chioma Sylvia Okoro, 2023. "Sustainable Facilities Management in the Built Environment: A Mixed-Method Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. John P. A. Ioannidis & Kevin W. Boyack & Henry Small & Aaron A. Sorensen & Richard Klavans, 2014. "Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best?," Nature, Nature, vol. 514(7524), pages 561-562, October.
    3. Irena Sajovic & Bojana Boh Podgornik, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Visualizations in Computer Graphics: A Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    4. Ruben Sánchez-Corcuera & Adrián Nuñez-Marcos & Jesus Sesma-Solance & Aritz Bilbao-Jayo & Rubén Mulero & Unai Zulaika & Gorka Azkune & Aitor Almeida, 2019. "Smart cities survey: Technologies, application domains and challenges for the cities of the future," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(6), pages 15501477198, June.
    5. Abubakar Sadiq Mohammed & Jannat Abbas & Alhassan Tahiru & Oliver Awuah & Eunice Onoma- Darko, 2023. "Assessment of Maintenance Practices in Health Care Institutions in Ghana; A Study of Bekwai Municipal Hospital," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(9), pages 1385-1398, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oleg Golubchikov & Mary J. Thornbush, 2022. "Smart Cities as Hybrid Spaces of Governance: Beyond the Hard/Soft Dichotomy in Cyber-Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    2. Ana Teresa Santos & Sandro Mendonça, 2022. "Do papers (really) match journals’ “aims and scope”? A computational assessment of innovation studies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 7449-7470, December.
    3. Shen, Hongquan & Xie, Juan & Ao, Weiyi & Cheng, Ying, 2022. "The continuity and citation impact of scientific collaboration with different gender composition," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    4. Shen, Hongquan & Cheng, Ying & Ju, Xiufang & Xie, Juan, 2022. "Rethinking the effect of inter-gender collaboration on research performance for scholars," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4).
    5. Sha, Kritika & Taeihagh, Araz & De Jong, Martin, 2024. "Governing disruptive technologies for inclusive development in cities: A systematic literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Abuljadail, Mohammad & Khalil, Ashraf & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet, 2023. "Big data analytics and e-governance: Actors, opportunities, tensions, and applications," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Brito, Ana C.M. & Silva, Filipi N. & de Arruda, Henrique F. & Comin, Cesar H. & Amancio, Diego R. & Costa, Luciano da F., 2021. "Classification of abrupt changes along viewing profiles of scientific articles," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    8. Gómez-Carmona, Oihane & Buján-Carballal, David & Casado-Mansilla, Diego & López-de-Ipiña, Diego & Cano-Benito, Juan & Cimmino, Andrea & Poveda-Villalón, María & García-Castro, Raúl & Almela-Miralles, , 2023. "Mind the gap: The AURORAL ecosystem for the digital transformation of smart communities and rural areas," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. Isager, Peder Mortvedt & van 't Veer, Anna Elisabeth & Lakens, Daniel, 2021. "Replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size," MetaArXiv knjea, Center for Open Science.
    10. Niu, Qikai & Zhou, Jianlin & Zeng, An & Fan, Ying & Di, Zengru, 2016. "Which publication is your representative work?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 842-853.
    11. Franklin Oliveira & Dilan Nery & Daniel G. Costa & Ivanovitch Silva & Luciana Lima, 2021. "A Survey of Technologies and Recent Developments for Sustainable Smart Cycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-28, March.
    12. Melinda Harm Benson & Christopher D. Lippitt & Ryan Morrison & Barbara Cosens & Jan Boll & Brian C. Chaffin & Alexander K. Fremier & Robert Heinse & Derek Kauneckis & Timothy E. Link & Caroline E. Scr, 2016. "Five ways to support interdisciplinary work before tenure," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 260-267, June.
    13. Qin Li & Shuangning Lv & Zonghao Chen & Jingya Cui & Wenlong Li & Yijun Liu, 2024. "Traditional Villages’ Cultural Tourism Spatial Quality Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, September.
    14. Ruijie Wang & Yuhao Zhou & An Zeng, 2023. "Evaluating scientists by citation and disruption of their representative works," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(3), pages 1689-1710, March.
    15. Paulo Antonio Maldonado Silveira Alonso Munhoz & Fabricio da Costa Dias & Christine Kowal Chinelli & André Luis Azevedo Guedes & João Alberto Neves dos Santos & Wainer da Silveira e Silva & Carlos Alb, 2020. "Smart Mobility: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Nan Deng & An Zeng, 2023. "Enhancing the robustness of the disruption metric against noise," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(4), pages 2419-2428, April.
    17. Libo Sheng & Dongqing Lyu & Xuanmin Ruan & Hongquan Shen & Ying Cheng, 2023. "The association between prior knowledge and the disruption of an article," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4731-4751, August.
    18. Carolina Navarro-Lopez & Salvador Linares-Mustaros & Carles Mulet-Forteza, 2022. "“The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data†by John Aitchison (1986): A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    19. Iqbal Yulizar Mukti & Maria E. Iacob & Adina Aldea & Rajesri Govindaraju & Jos Hillegersberg, 2022. "Defining Rural Smartness and Its Impact: A Systematic Literature Review," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 956-1007, June.
    20. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Iztok Podbregar, 2021. "Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:6:p:510-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.