IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v11y2024i11p305-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Struggle to Protect the Worker: Safety and Security – Enemies or Friends?

Author

Listed:
  • Esang Lazarus Esitikot

    (Highstone Global University, Texas, USA)

  • Akaninyene Edet Ekong

    (Highstone Global University, Texas, USA)

  • Mary Ubong Umoh

    (Institute of Health, Safety, Security and Environment Studies, University of Uyo, Nigeria)

  • Clement O. Obadimu

    (Institute of Health, Safety, Security and Environment Studies, University of Uyo, Nigeria)

  • Gerald Ndubuisi Okeke

    (Highstone Global University, Texas, USA)

  • Anthony Akadi

    (Institute of Health, Safety, Security and Environment Studies, University of Uyo, Nigeria)

  • Utibe Amos Ofon

    (Institute of Health, Safety, Security and Environment Studies, University of Uyo, Nigeria)

Abstract

Preventing hurt to workers, organizations and the environment has been the concern of organizational leaders for years. Part of the strategies to address this concern is the implementation of safety and security management systems. While safety management system typically focusses on preventing harm from erroneous and unintended actions and inactions of organizational workers and management, security management system tries to address exposure to harm from deliberate and malicious actions of workers and personnel external to the organization. While both safety and security management system complement each other in preventing harm from internal and external activities, there are some areas of conflict between both. In such areas, implementation of safety requirements becomes counter-productive to security requirements and vice versa. The challenge is that in many instances, safety and security are treated as independent concepts and managed by separate processes and guidelines. This study was carried out through the critical review of relevant literature on the studies done on the interaction between safety and security in different organizations. The study recommends a deviation from the practice of treating safety and security as independent concepts and proposes the integration of safety and security management systems to enhance effectiveness and efficiency. Achieving that will, however, require a redefined risk assessment methodology that addresses both the concept of safety and security, training of safety professional in security procedures and training of security professionals in safety procedures, deployment of integrated health, safety, security and environment (HSSE) management systems and polices, and review of organizational structure to enable safety and security decision by common authority. As part of awareness and enhancement of safety and security advocacy, the study recommends inclusion of safety and security in secondary school curriculum and a cultural shift in understanding of how safety and security adversely impact each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Esang Lazarus Esitikot & Akaninyene Edet Ekong & Mary Ubong Umoh & Clement O. Obadimu & Gerald Ndubuisi Okeke & Anthony Akadi & Utibe Amos Ofon, 2024. "The Struggle to Protect the Worker: Safety and Security – Enemies or Friends?," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(11), pages 305-313, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:305-313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-11-issue-11/305-313.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/the-struggle-to-protect-the-worker-safety-and-security-enemies-or-friends/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Boholm & Niklas Möller & Sven Ove Hansson, 2016. "The Concepts of Risk, Safety, and Security: Applications in Everyday Language," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 320-338, February.
    2. Piètre-Cambacédès, Ludovic & Chaudet, Claude, 2010. "The SEMA referential framework: Avoiding ambiguities in the terms “security” and “safety”," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 55-66.
    3. Piètre-Cambacédès, L. & Bouissou, M., 2013. "Cross-fertilization between safety and security engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 110-126.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Windelberg, Marjorie, 2016. "Objectives for managing cyber supply chain risk," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 4-11.
    2. Evgeny Lisin & Wadim Strielkowski & Veronika Chernova & Alena Fomina, 2018. "Assessment of the Territorial Energy Security in the Context of Energy Systems Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Wang, Wei & Cammi, Antonio & Di Maio, Francesco & Lorenzi, Stefano & Zio, Enrico, 2018. "A Monte Carlo-based exploration framework for identifying components vulnerable to cyber threats in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 24-37.
    4. Roberta Ingaramo & Luca Pascale, 2020. "An Interpretative Matrix for an Adaptive Design Approach. Italian School Infrastructure: Safety and Social Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Kim, Hee Eun & Son, Han Seong & Kim, Jonghyun & Kang, Hyun Gook, 2017. "Systematic development of scenarios caused by cyber-attack-induced human errors in nuclear power plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 290-301.
    6. Jingjing Hao & Guangsheng Han, 2020. "On the Modeling of Automotive Security: A Survey of Methods and Perspectives," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    8. Roberta Troisi & Gaetano Alfano, 2019. "Towns as Safety Organizational Fields: An Institutional Framework in Times of Emergency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Belschak-Jacobs, G., 2018. "Organisational Behaviour and Culture," ERIM Inaugural Address Series Research in Management 105093, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam..
    10. Kriaa, Siwar & Pietre-Cambacedes, Ludovic & Bouissou, Marc & Halgand, Yoran, 2015. "A survey of approaches combining safety and security for industrial control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 156-178.
    11. SICARD, Franck & ZAMAI, Éric & FLAUS, Jean-Marie, 2019. "An approach based on behavioral models and critical states distance notion for improving cybersecurity of industrial control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 584-603.
    12. Peter Blokland & Genserik Reniers, 2019. "An Ontological and Semantic Foundation for Safety and Security Science," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-25, October.
    13. Georgios Kavallieratos & Sokratis Katsikas & Vasileios Gkioulos, 2020. "Cybersecurity and Safety Co-Engineering of Cyberphysical Systems—A Comprehensive Survey," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Max Boholm, 2019. "Risk and Quantification: A Linguistic Study," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1243-1261, June.
    15. Butot, Vivien & Bayerl, Petra Saskia & Jacobs, Gabriele & de Haan, Freek, 2020. "Citizen repertoires of smart urban safety: Perspectives from Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Casson Moreno, Valeria & Marroni, Giulia & Landucci, Gabriele, 2022. "Probabilistic assessment aimed at the evaluation of escalating scenarios in process facilities combining safety and security barriers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    17. Alanen, Jarmo & Linnosmaa, Joonas & Malm, Timo & Papakonstantinou, Nikolaos & Ahonen, Toni & Heikkilä, Eetu & Tiusanen, Risto, 2022. "Hybrid ontology for safety, security, and dependability risk assessments and Security Threat Analysis (STA) method for industrial control systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    18. Robert L. Heath & Jaesub Lee & Michael J. Palenchar & Laura L. Lemon, 2018. "Risk Communication Emergency Response Preparedness: Contextual Assessment of the Protective Action Decision Model," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(2), pages 333-344, February.
    19. Anna E. Wolnowska & Lech Kasyk, 2021. "Identification of Threats in the Supply Chain of a Production Process," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2 - Part ), pages 568-587.
    20. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:568-587 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:11:p:305-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.