IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v11y2020i2p149-158n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Standard Project Risk Analysis Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Žužek Tena

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Rihar Lidija

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Berlec Tomaž

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Kušar Janez

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background: To stay competitive in a highly unpredictable market of today, companies must be able to manage project risks effectively. The basis for an effective risk management is a thorough risk analysis. Despite the availability of many different risk analysis approaches, companies can be reluctant to use them, since the models are usually complex and very time consuming.Objectives: The main objective is to present a simple, yet effective risk analysis approach that can also serve as a useful basis for resolving project risks.Methods/Approach: The proposed standard risk analysis approach is based on a standard risk model that deals with risk events and impacts separately and therefore allows for a separate planning of preventive and corrective measures. To classify risks and to represent them graphically, a risk map is used.Results: The use of the proposed approach is illustrated on a die-cast tool development project. The approach proved to be very simple to use and it served as a useful basis for resolving the identified risks.Conclusions: The main advantage of the proposed approach is its simplicity and clarity. It can also be used as a quick decision-making tool in a subsequent risk resolving process.

Suggested Citation

  • Žužek Tena & Rihar Lidija & Berlec Tomaž & Kušar Janez, 2020. "Standard Project Risk Analysis Approach," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 149-158, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:149-158:n:11
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2020-0021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0021
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jianping Li & Chunbing Bao & Dengsheng Wu, 2018. "How to Design Rating Schemes of Risk Matrices: A Sequential Updating Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 99-117, January.
    2. Aven, Terje, 2016. "Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(1), pages 1-13.
    3. E.S. Levine, 2012. "Improving risk matrices: the advantages of logarithmically scaled axes," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 209-222, February.
    4. Refaul Ferdous & Faisal Khan & Rehan Sadiq & Paul Amyotte & Brian Veitch, 2011. "Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 86-107, January.
    5. Stefano Tonchia, 2018. "The International Standards of Project Management," Management for Professionals, in: Industrial Project Management, edition 2, chapter 2, pages 7-20, Springer.
    6. Stefano Tonchia, 2018. "Industrial Project Management," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-662-56328-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. Acebes & J. M. González-Varona & A. López-Paredes & J. Pajares, 2024. "Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Alberto Pasanisi & Mathieu Couplet, 2017. "A critical discussion and practical recommendations on some issues relevant to the non-probabilistic treatment of uncertainty in engineering risk assessment," Post-Print hal-01652230, HAL.
    3. Hasibuan, Abdul Muis & Gregg, Daniel & Stringer, Randy, 2020. "Accounting for diverse risk attitudes in measures of risk perceptions: A case study of climate change risk for small-scale citrus farmers in Indonesia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Nicola Pedroni & Enrico Zio & Alberto Pasanisi & Mathieu Couplet, 2017. "A Critical Discussion and Practical Recommendations on Some Issues Relevant to the Nonprobabilistic Treatment of Uncertainty in Engineering Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(7), pages 1315-1340, July.
    5. Andres Mauricio Molina Barreto & Naoyuki Ishimura, 2023. "Remarks on a copula‐based conditional value at risk for the portfolio problem," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(3), pages 150-170, July.
    6. Serpell Alfredo Federico & Ferrada Ximena & Rubio Larissa, 2019. "Measuring the performance of project risk management: a preliminary model," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1984-1991, January.
    7. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    8. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Nur Shazwani Ab Hamid & Erlane K Ghani, 2019. "Examining the Relationship Between Enterprise Risk Management and Firm Performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 239-251, May.
    9. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoqian Zhu & Jie Wan & Chunbing Bao & Jianping Li, 2019. "A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting Risk Response Strategies of Software Project: From the Perspective of Risk Correlations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 339-364, January.
    10. Bożena Babiarz, 2018. "Aspects of Heat Supply Security Management Using Elements of Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Leif Inge K. Sørskår & Eirik B. Abrahamsen, 2017. "On how to manage uncertainty when considering regulatory HSE interventions," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(1), pages 97-116, November.
    12. Davide Settembre-Blundo & Rocío González-Sánchez & Sonia Medina-Salgado & Fernando E. García-Muiña, 2021. "Flexibility and Resilience in Corporate Decision Making: A New Sustainability-Based Risk Management System in Uncertain Times," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 107-132, December.
    13. Maria Cheveresan & Cristian Stefan Dumitriu & Maria Stoica, 2024. "Environmental Economics in Flood Mitigation for River Basins and Cities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 50-57, August.
    14. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Cyril Foropon, 2022. "Quality management in humanitarian operations and disaster relief management: a review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1045-1098, December.
    15. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Stamatis Kontsas & Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Operational risk management in managerial accounting: a comprehensive examination of strategies and implementation in medium size organizations," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1-27, September.
    16. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:69-75 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Wu, Jiansong & Bai, Yiping & Fang, Weipeng & Zhou, Rui & Reniers, Genserik & Khakzad, Nima, 2021. "An Integrated Quantitative Risk Assessment Method for Urban Underground Utility Tunnels," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    18. Mussard, Stéphane & Pi Alperin, María Noel, 2021. "Accounting for risk factors on health outcomes: The case of Luxembourg," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(3), pages 1180-1197.
    19. Mazurina Mohd Ali & Sakinah Zahra Norman & Erlane K. Ghani* & Noor Hasniza Haron, 2018. "The Influence of Risk Management on Construction Project Performance: A Case Study," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 936-942:5.
    20. Tomasz Zwęgliński, 2022. "Conventional Event Tree Analysis on Emergency Release of Liquefied Natural Gas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-12, March.
    21. Dimitrios Chionis & Nektarios Karanikas, 2022. "Risk Perception and Risk Communication from a Systems Perspective: a Study on Safety Behavioural Intervention Frameworks and Functions," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 711-746, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk management; risk analysis; standard risk model; risk map;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O22 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Project Analysis
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:11:y:2020:i:2:p:149-158:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.