IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v10y2019i1p1-12n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Business Intelligence Projects Success – a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Teixeira Ana

    (NOVA Information Management School, Tintas Robbialac, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Oliveira Tiago

    (NOVA Information Management School, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Varajão João

    (University of Minho, Centro ALGORITMI, Braga, Portugal)

Abstract

Background: Many studies found in literature only focus on specific aspects of the evaluation of the success of projects, such as the criteria for evaluation; and just a few are focused on the activities for evaluating success. Objectives: The goal of the paper is to present the process for evaluating the success of Business Intelligence (BI) projects in a large company. Methods/Approach: An exploratory case study was carried out at Tintas Robbialac, SA, a Portuguese company of the paint industry. Results: The specific company approach for evaluating the success of BI projects is presented and discussed. Conclusions: The process for evaluating the success of BI, as well as the evaluation criteria, should be formally defined; and the success should be evaluated and monitored along all the project lifecycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Teixeira Ana & Oliveira Tiago & Varajão João, 2019. "Evaluation of Business Intelligence Projects Success – a Case Study," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:1-12:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2019-0001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2019-0001
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2019-0001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Terzieva Mariya & Morabito Vincenzo, 2016. "Learning from Experience: The Project Team is the Key," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Alexandra RUSANEANU, 2013. "Comparative Analysis of the Main Business Intelligence Solutions," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(2), pages 148-156.
    3. Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi & Claude Narcisse Niamba, 2016. "An evaluation of business intelligence tools: a cluster analysis of users’ perceptions," Post-Print hal-03165570, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sharifa Aldarmaki & Bahari Yaakub Kamarul, 2022. "Measurements of Organizational Excellence - Development of Holistic Excellence Practices for Free Zones in Dubai," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 8, January -.
    2. Besek Barbara, 2023. "Redefining Success: How Personal Ambitions and Confidence Levels Shape IT Project Dynamic," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 61-80, December.
    3. Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi & Claude-Narcisse Niamba & Julien Duquennoy, 2018. "An evaluation of competitive and technological intelligence tools: A cluster analysis of users’ perceptions," Post-Print hal-03165565, HAL.
    4. Prof. Dr.Sejdi Rexhepi & Mjellma Kadriu, 2018. "The Importance of Resource Assessment for Entrepreneurship and Local Economic Development in Kosovo," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 4, ejes_v4_i.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:10:y:2019:i:1:p:1-12:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.