IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojtjep/v8y2024i9p1-19id2407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empowering Novice Teachers through Mentorship and Supported Teaching in Schools: Implications for Education Policy and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Ampomah
  • Jacob Manu
  • Kwadwo Oteng Akyina

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to support novice teachers in teacher education institutions in Ghana on how mentoring and supported teaching in schools (STS) can be used to shape the novice teacher’s thought on the school profile dimension throughout the mentoring relationship. The purpose is to review literature on mentoring using Hudson's five factor mentoring model process and STS and think through how mentoring and STS can be improved in teacher preparation. The Hudson's five factor model of mentoring was used as the conceptual framework. Methodology: The study was conducted using document analysis (secondary data sources), such as reports, online papers, or datasets that have already been gathered from Google, ERIC, Research gate, and Academia. Findings: The findings of the study were that the STS has created an opportunity for mentors to spend time with their mentees and share their professional and pedagogical experiences. Again, it is believed that structured mentoring, feedback and reflection would enhance the student teacher’s capacity to succeed. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study suggests that there should be on-going professional development for mentors, structured mentoring programmes, feedback and reflection mechanisms to check for coherence through assessment procedures and monitor students’ progress. Case study research can also serve to illuminate both positive and problematic aspects of the STS mentoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Ampomah & Jacob Manu & Kwadwo Oteng Akyina, 2024. "Empowering Novice Teachers through Mentorship and Supported Teaching in Schools: Implications for Education Policy and Practice," Journal of Education and Practice, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 8(9), pages 1-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjep:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:1-19:id:2407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/2407/2861
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjep:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:1-19:id:2407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.