Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between performance appraisal systems and employee motivation in Tunisia. Materials and Methods: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that well-structured appraisal systems can significantly enhance employee motivation by providing clear and measurable goals, constructive feedback, and recognition of achievements. When employees understand the criteria by which they are evaluated and perceive the appraisal process as fair and transparent, their motivation to improve performance and achieve organizational goals increases. Furthermore, appraisal systems that incorporate regular feedback and involve employees in goal-setting foster a sense of ownership and commitment, further boosting motivation. However, the effectiveness of these systems heavily depends on their design and implementation. Appraisal systems perceived as biased, inconsistent, or solely focused on criticism can demotivate employees, leading to disengagement and decreased performance. Thus, the relationship between performance appraisal systems and employee motivation is strongly influenced by the perceived fairness, clarity, and constructiveness of the appraisal process. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Self-determination theory, goal-setting theory and expectancy theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the relationship between performance appraisal systems and employee motivation in Tunisia. Organizations should adopt a tailored approach to design PAS that align with the unique motivational needs and challenges of different sectors, roles, and work arrangements. Policymakers should emphasize the importance of cultural sensitivity in PAS design and implementation.
Suggested Citation
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojtejh:v:8:y:2024:i:2:p:1-11:id:2085
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtejh:v:8:y:2024:i:2:p:1-11:id:2085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/EJH/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.