IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beo/ekidpr/y2024i52p21-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Konceptualni Okvir Za Analizu Nejednakih Šansi U Obrazovanju (A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis Of Unequal Opportunities In Education)

Author

Listed:
  • Nemanja Vuksanović

Abstract

Polazeći od veze između obrazovne i dohodne distribucije u zemlji, i važnosti redukcije obrazovnih nejednakosti kako bi se smanjila dohodna nejednakost, u radu je prikazan konceptualni okvir koji istraživačima može poslužiti kao osnov za analizu nejednakih šansi u obrazovanju. U radu su predstavljene osnovne ideje nekoliko teoretičara društvene jednakosti, poput Rolsa, Dvorkina i Sena. Istaknuto je da su upravo Rolsova teorija pravde, Dvorkinovo gledište o jednakim resursima i Senov pristup sposobnostima poslužili kao osnov za ekonomsko modeliranje jednakih šansi u okviru dva različita pristupa. Prvi pristup počiva na formalizaciji pojma jednakosti šansi u ekonomskim modelima koji tretiraju šanse eksplicitno, dok se drugi pristup zasniva na formalnom tretiranju jednakosti šansi u sklopu ekonomskih modela koji šanse posmatraju implicitno. U radu je poseban fokus stavljen na Romerov teorijsko-metodološki okvir koji počiva na potrebi redukcije nejednakosti koje su povezane sa karakteristikama pojedinaca na koje on nema uticaja, uz isticanje razlike između faktora napora i faktora okolnosti.

Suggested Citation

  • Nemanja Vuksanović, 2024. "Konceptualni Okvir Za Analizu Nejednakih Šansi U Obrazovanju (A Conceptual Framework For The Analysis Of Unequal Opportunities In Education)," Ekonomske ideje i praksa, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, issue 52, pages 21-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2024:i:52:p:21-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ekof.bg.ac.rs/journals/eip/52/02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kranich, Laurence, 1996. "Equitable Opportunities: An Axiomatic Approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 131-147, October.
    2. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Jérémie Gignoux, 2014. "The Measurement of Educational Inequality: Achievement and Opportunity," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 28(2), pages 210-246.
    3. John Weymark, 2003. "Generalized Gini Indices of Equality of Opportunity," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 1(1), pages 5-24, April.
    4. John E. Roemer & Alain Trannoy, 2016. "Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1288-1332, December.
    5. Erikson, Robert, 2020. "Inequality of Educational Opportunity – The Role of Performance and Choice," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(S1), pages 44-55, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Vito Peragine, 2015. "Equality of opportunity: Theory and evidence," Working Papers 359, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    2. Vito Peragine & Laura Serlenga, 2008. "Higher education and equality of opportunity in Italy," Research on Economic Inequality, in: Inequality and Opportunity: Papers from the Second ECINEQ Society Meeting, pages 67-97, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    3. Panchanan Das & Sumita Biswas, 2022. "Social Identity, Gender and Unequal Opportunity of Earning in Urban India: 2017–2018 to 2019–2020," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 65(1), pages 39-57, March.
    4. Jorge Alcalde-Unzu & Miguel Ballester, 2012. "Ranking opportunity profiles through dependent evaluation of policies," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 10(4), pages 471-487, December.
    5. Huda Mohamed Mukhtar Ahmed & Eiman Adil Mohamed Osman & Hatim Ameer Mahran, 2020. "Inequality of Opportunity in The Labor Market: Evidence from Sudan," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(2), pages 38-56, December.
    6. Nie, Peng & Ding, Lanlin & Jones, Andrew M., 2020. "Inequality of Opportunity in Bodyweight among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese: A Distributional Approach," IZA Discussion Papers 13421, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Lanlin Ding & Andrew M. Jones & Peng Nie, 2022. "Ex ante Inequality of Opportunity in Health among the Elderly in China: A Distributional Decomposition Analysis of Biomarkers," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(4), pages 922-950, December.
    8. Martínez-Jiménez, Mario & Hollingsworth, Bruce & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2024. "Socioeconomic deprivation, health and healthcare utilisation among millennials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    9. Guido Neidhöfer & Leonardo Gasparini & Matias Ciaschi, "undated". "Intergenerational mobility of economic well-being in Latin America," Working Papers 620, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    10. Mortazavi Kakhaki, Morteza & Haqiqi, Iman & Mahdavi Adeli, Mohammad, 2013. "Regional Equality of Opportunities and Income: A General Equilibrium Modeling for Iran," MPRA Paper 95822, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Laurence Kranich, 2009. "Measuring opportunity inequality with monetary transfers," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 7(4), pages 371-385, December.
    12. John E. Roemer & Alain Trannoy, 2016. "Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1288-1332, December.
    13. Rebeca Echávarri & Iñaki Permanyer, 2008. "Ranking profiles of capability sets," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(3), pages 521-535, October.
    14. Vincenzo Carrieri & Andrew M. Jones, 2018. "Inequality of opportunity in health: A decomposition‐based approach," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(12), pages 1981-1995, December.
    15. Antonio Abatemarco, 2015. "A Gini approach to inequality of opportunity: evidence from the PSID," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1497-1519, December.
    16. Kristof Bosmans & Z. Emel Öztürk, 2021. "Measurement of inequality of opportunity: A normative approach," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 19(2), pages 213-237, June.
    17. Balwant Singh Mehta & Siddharth Dhote & Ravi Srivastava, 2023. "Decomposition of Inequality of Opportunity in India: An Application of Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 66(2), pages 439-469, June.
    18. Enza Simeone, 2023. "Inequality in health status during the COVID-19 in the UK: does the impact of the second lockdown policy matter?," Working Papers 661, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    19. Ionuț Jianu & Marin Dinu & Dragoș Huru & Alexandru Bodislav, 2021. "Examining the Relationship between Income Inequality and Growth from the Perspective of EU Member States’ Stage of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Zlata Bruckauf & UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, 2016. "Falling Behind: Socio-demographic profiles of educationally disadvantaged youth. Evidence from PISA 2000-2012," Papers inwopa837, Innocenti Working Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nejednake obrazovne šanse; teorija društvene jednakosti; ekonomsko modeliranje jednakih šansi;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beo:ekidpr:y:2024:i:52:p:21-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Goran Petrić (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efbeoyu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.