IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bec/imsber/v1y2009i1p25-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictability Of Returns: A Case Study Of Karachi Stock Exchange, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Javed

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Muhammad Rafiq

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Uzma Atta

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

  • Muhammad Atiq

    (Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar)

Abstract

The study has been designed to investigate the information efficiency in the Karachi stock market. This is examined using stock market indices from July 1997 – July 2007. Weekly stock indices are used for evaluation of KSE. The daily stock indices are not used because of several biases such as bid ask spread, non-trading etc. The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) was tested using a GARCH model. It is concluded that Karachi Stock Exchange is information inefficient and the predictability of returns and risk is possible. These tests indicate non-randomness in the behavior of Karachi Stock Exchange indices and hence cast a shadow on the efficiency at the KSE. These are the powerful test and hence their results can be relied upon. The study recommends that SECP step up its regularity measures in the general interest of the public

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Javed & Muhammad Rafiq & Uzma Atta & Muhammad Atiq, 2009. "Predictability Of Returns: A Case Study Of Karachi Stock Exchange, Pakistan," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 1(1), pages 25-28, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:25-28
    DOI: .
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://imsciences.edu.pk/files/journals/Vol.%201%20No.%201%20October%202009/JB&ER-5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/.?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fama, Eugene F., 1998. "Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 283-306, September.
    2. Andrew W. Lo, A. Craig MacKinlay, 1988. "Stock Market Prices do not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 41-66.
    3. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    4. Darrat, Ali F & Zhong, Maosen, 2000. "On Testing the Random-Walk Hypothesis: A Model-Comparison Approach," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 35(3), pages 105-124, August.
    5. Fama, Eugene F, 1991. "Efficient Capital Markets: II," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 46(5), pages 1575-1617, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amélie Charles & Olivier Darné & Jessica Fouilloux, 2010. "Testing the Martingale Difference Hypothesis in the EU ETS Markets for the CO2 Emission Allowances: Evidence from Phase I and Phase II," Post-Print hal-00797491, HAL.
    2. Basher ABUZAROUR, 2001. "Testing Random Walk Behavior and Market Efficiency: Evidence from New Emerging Equity Markets in the Middle East," Middle East and North Africa 330400002, EcoMod.
    3. Carmen López-Martín & Sonia Benito Muela & Raquel Arguedas, 2021. "Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: new evidence," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 11(3), pages 403-431, September.
    4. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2013. "Understanding Asset Prices," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
    5. Godfrey, Keith R.L., 2017. "Toward a model-free measure of market efficiency," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 97-112.
    6. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier & Fouilloux, Jessica, 2011. "Testing the martingale difference hypothesis in CO2 emission allowances," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 27-35.
    7. Kamal, Mona, 2014. "Studying the Validity of the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) in the Egyptian Exchange (EGX) after the 25th of January Revolution," MPRA Paper 54708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2009. "The random walk hypothesis for Chinese stock markets: Evidence from variance ratio tests," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 117-126, June.
    9. Ke Meng & Shouhao Li, 2021. "The adaptive market hypothesis and high frequency trading," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Abullah M. Noman & Minhaz U. Ahmed, 2008. "Efficiency of the foreign exchange markets in South Asian Countries," AIUB Bus Econ Working Paper Series AIUB-BUS-ECON-2008-18, American International University-Bangladesh (AIUB), Office of Research and Publications (ORP), revised Jun 2008.
    11. Samuel Showalter & Jeffrey Gropp, 2019. "Validating Weak-form Market Efficiency in United States Stock Markets with Trend Deterministic Price Data and Machine Learning," Papers 1909.05151, arXiv.org.
    12. Halil Åžen & Mehmet Fatih Demiral, 2016. "Hospital Location Selection with Grey System Theory," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May - Aug.
    13. Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan & Everton Dockery, 2021. "Testing for efficiency in the Saudi stock market: does corporate governance change matter?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 61-90, July.
    14. Fatma SIALA GUERMEZI, & Amani BOUSSAADA, 2016. "The Weak Form Of Informational Efficiency: Case Of Tunisian Banking Sector," EcoForum, "Stefan cel Mare" University of Suceava, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Public Administration - Economy, Business Administration and Tourism Department., vol. 5(1), pages 1-1, January.
    15. Ashok Chanabasangouda Patil & Shailesh Rastogi, 2019. "Time-Varying Price–Volume Relationship and Adaptive Market Efficiency: A Survey of the Empirical Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Madhavi Latha Challa & Venkataramanaiah Malepati & Siva Nageswara Rao Kolusu, 2020. "S&P BSE Sensex and S&P BSE IT return forecasting using ARIMA," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Ben Rejeb, Aymen & Boughrara, Adel, 2013. "Financial liberalization and stock markets efficiency: New evidence from emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 186-208.
    18. Leković Miljan, 2018. "Evidence for and Against the Validity of Efficient Market Hypothesis," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 56(3), pages 369-387, September.
    19. Sonntag, Dominik, 2018. "Die Theorie der fairen geometrischen Rendite [The Theory of Fair Geometric Returns]," MPRA Paper 87082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Hung, Jui-Cheng, 2009. "Deregulation and liberalization of the Chinese stock market and the improvement of market efficiency," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 843-857, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Information efficiency; stock market; predictability; returns;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bec:imsber:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:25-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Attaullah Shah (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imspepk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.