IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijcp/v10y2025i1p33-46id3198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crisis Communication and its Impact on Stakeholder Trust in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Akpene Mawusi

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the crisis communication and its impact on stakeholder trust in Ghana. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: In Ghana's financial sector, effective crisis communication is essential for maintaining stakeholder trust. Transparent and timely information helps preserve confidence, while delayed or inadequate communication can harm trust and damage reputations. Studies suggest that comprehensive crisis communication plans are crucial for Ghanaian financial institutions to protect stakeholder trust during crises. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Situational crisis communication theory, image repair theory & social exchange theory may be used to anchor future studies on recommend PR practitioners should prioritize rapid and transparent communication with stakeholders during a crisis, as delays or perceived dishonesty can severely damage trust. Governments and regulatory bodies should introduce guidelines and regulations for organizations on crisis communication best practices, particularly focusing on the timely release of accurate information during crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Akpene Mawusi, 2025. "Crisis Communication and its Impact on Stakeholder Trust in Ghana," International Journal of Communication and Public Relation, IPRJB, vol. 10(1), pages 33-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijcp:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:33-46:id:3198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJCPR/article/view/3198/3843
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijcp:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:33-46:id:3198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJCPR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.