IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i12p1189-1199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Review on Pharmaceutical Marketing Strategies from Medical Representatives in Doctors’ Prescribing Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Amrita Acharya

    (Business Administration, Infrastructure University of Kuala Lumpur)

  • Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid

    (Business Administration, Infrastructure University of Kuala Lumpur)

Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is a critical driver of improved healthcare outcomes, significantly enhancing quality of life. Its growth has been fueled by increasing demands driven by the rising prevalence of chronic and age-related diseases and shifts in medical practices. This expansion has necessitated innovative and often complex marketing strategies to influence prescribing behaviour among doctors. The pharmaceutical industry is heavily regulated, particularly in its marketing efforts, where direct consumer advertising is prohibited. Instead, pharmaceutical companies direct their marketing strategies towards doctors, who play a pivotal role as decision-makers in determining which drugs patients receive. These marketing efforts are designed to foster relationships, disseminate product information, and ultimately encourage the adoption of specific drugs. These various marketing activities are directed towards doctors beginning as early as medical school and continuing throughout their careers. Such strategies are designed to build relationships and shape doctors’ prescribing behaviour, with the ultimate aim of increasing sales for pharmaceutical companies. However, the influence of these marketing activities has raised concerns regarding the rationality of prescribing, the quality of prescribed medicines, and potential conflicts of interest. The balance between marketing efforts to boost sales and ensuring the responsible prescription of cost-effective medicines remains a challenge. In a country like Nepal, there are specific concerns regarding the quality of locally produced pharmaceuticals and the preference for multinational brands. This study aims to explore the various marketing strategies employed by pharmaceutical companies between 2019 and 2023, focusing on their impact on doctors’ prescribing decisions. Key promotional tactics include the provision of free drug samples, sponsorships for medical education, and personal interactions with medical representatives (MRs). The findings indicate that promotional efforts, particularly those involving personal engagement by MRs, significantly shape doctors’ drug prescriptions. However, this influence also raises ethical questions, with concerns over the potential for irrational prescribing and the role of gifts and incentives in shaping medical decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Amrita Acharya & Abu Bakar Abdul Hamid, 2024. "A Review on Pharmaceutical Marketing Strategies from Medical Representatives in Doctors’ Prescribing Decisions," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(12), pages 1189-1199, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:1189-1199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-12/1189-1199.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/a-review-on-pharmaceutical-marketing-strategies-from-medical-representatives-in-doctors-prescribing-decisions/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janet M. Currie & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2020. "Understanding Doctor Decision Making: The Case of Depression Treatment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 847-878, May.
    2. Janet M. Currie & W. Bentley MacLeod, 2018. "Understanding Doctor Decision Making: The Case of Depression," NBER Working Papers 24955, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Rizwan Raheem Ahmed & Dalia Streimikiene & Josef Abrhám & Justas Streimikis & Jolita Vveinhardt, 2020. "Social and Behavioral Theories and Physician’s Prescription Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie, Olivier & Zwiers, Esmée, 2022. "Religious Barriers to Birth Control Access," CEPR Discussion Papers 17427, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Wu, Bingxiao & David, Guy, 2022. "Information, relative skill, and technology abandonment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Attema, Arthur E. & Galizzi, Matteo M. & Groß, Mona & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Karay, Yassin & L’Haridon, Olivier & Wiesen, Daniel, 2023. "The formation of physician altruism," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Keith Joiner & Pierre Thomas Léger, 2023. "Physician Practice Style and Healthcare Costs: Evidence from Emergency Departments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3202-3219, June.
    5. Peter Rønø Thingholm, 2023. "Provider Spill-Overs in Opioid Prescription Leniency and Patient – Labor Market Outcomes," Economics Working Papers 2023-05, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    6. Ida Lykke Kristiansen & Sophie Yanying Sheng, 2022. "Doctor Who? The Effect of Physician-Patient Match on The SES-Health Gradient," CEBI working paper series 22-05, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    7. Mette Goertz & Ida Lykke Kristiansen & Tianyi Wang, 2024. "The Power of Daughters: How Physicians Family Influences Female Patients Health," CEBI working paper series 24-18, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    8. Alessandro Lizzeri & Eran Shmaya & Leeat Yariv, 2024. "Disentangling Exploration from Exploitation," NBER Working Papers 32424, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Christian Posso & Jorge Tamayo & Arlen Guarin & Estefania Saravia, 2024. "Luck of the Draw: The Causal Effect of Physicians on Birth Outcomes," Borradores de Economia 1269, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    10. Avdic, Daniel & Ivets, Maryna & Lagerqvist, Bo & Sriubaite, Ieva, 2023. "Providers, peers and patients. How do physicians’ practice environments affect patient outcomes?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    11. Ivan Badinski & Amy Finkelstein & Matthew Gentzkow & Peter Hull, 2023. "Geographic Variation in Healthcare Utilization: The Role of Physicians," NBER Working Papers 31749, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Avdic, Daniel & von Hinke, Stephanie & Lagerqvist, Bo & Propper, Carol & Vikström, Johan, 2024. "Do responses to news matter? Evidence from interventional cardiology," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Si, Yafei & Bateman, Hazel & Chen, Shu & Hanewald, Katja & Li, Bingqin & Su, Min & Zhou, Zhongliang, 2023. "Quantifying the financial impact of overuse in primary care in China: A standardised patient study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    14. Laura Grigolon & Laura Lasio, 2023. "Biased Beliefs and Stigma as Barriers to Treatment and Innovation Adoption," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2023_277v2, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    15. Ashesh Rambachan, 2022. "Identifying Prediction Mistakes in Observational Data," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Artificial Intelligence, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. McKibbin, Rebecca, 2023. "The effect of RCTs on drug demand: Evidence from off-label cancer drugs," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    17. Sebastian Calónico & Rafael Di Tella & Juan Cruz Lopez del Valle, 2023. "The Political Economy of a “Miracle Cure”: The Case of Nebulized Ibuprofen and its Diffusion in Argentina," NBER Working Papers 31781, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Jacob Zureich, 2023. "The (Un)Controllability Principle: The Benefits of Holding Employees Accountable for Uncontrollable Factors," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 653-690, May.
    19. Aparajithan Venkateswaran & Jishnu Das & Tyler H. McCormick, 2023. "Feasible contact tracing," Papers 2312.05718, arXiv.org.
    20. Ity Shurtz, 2022. "Heuristic thinking in the workplace: Evidence from primary care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1713-1729, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:12:p:1189-1199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.