IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v8y2024i11p656-681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Effective Investment Evaluation Methods for Servicescape Intangible Value Quantification

Author

Listed:
  • Syarah Syazwani Arifin

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Survey, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

  • Izran Sarrazin Mohammad

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Survey, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

  • Rohaya Abdul Jalil

    (Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Built Environment & Survey, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia)

Abstract

Servicescape upgrades are often regarded as improvements to the intangible aspects of business performance, such as an increased sense of place, levels of comfort, safety, pleasure, inspiration, and satisfaction for both customers and employees. This presents a significant challenge for facilities managers who must convince the top management, particularly the finance department, that a proposed service scape upgrade will yield financial benefits for the business. Although investment return evaluation methods that are purportedly able to quantify intangible values exist, these methods are typically designed to measure only the monetary costs and benefits associated with a project. As a result, they may not fully capture the intangible value inherent in service scape upgrading investments. In response to this gap, the authors are conducting a research to develop an anticipated investment return calculation theoretical model for service scape upgrades based on the quantification of intangible values. This paper presents a part of the findings from the first phase of the research which focuses on identifying the essential characteristics needed for an investment return evaluation method to quantify service scape intangible values. A mix of qualitative and quantitative approach was adopted, starting with the identification of the characteristics from the literature. Twelve experts that included academics and practitioners in economic valuation, non-market valuation, and methodologies for quantifying intangible values were then interviewed to assess whether the identified characteristics are indeed required to quantify service scape intangible values. The interview data were analysed progressively using content analysis, frequency and Relative Importance Index until data saturation was achieved. The result indicates that qualitative metrics, and long-term perspective are the most important characteristics needed for an investment evaluation method to quantify service scape intangible values. These findings will help guide the selection of appropriate investment evaluation methods to be incorporated into the anticipated investment return theoretical model for service scape upgrades. This in turn may assist decision-makers alike to determine the investment return of a proposed service scape upgrading project in monetary sense despite the intangible nature of the project’s values.

Suggested Citation

  • Syarah Syazwani Arifin & Izran Sarrazin Mohammad & Rohaya Abdul Jalil, 2024. "Characteristics of Effective Investment Evaluation Methods for Servicescape Intangible Value Quantification," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(11), pages 656-681, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:656-681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-8-issue-11/656-681.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/characteristics-of-effective-investment-evaluation-methods-for-servicescape-intangible-value-quantification/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baruch Lev & Stefano Zambon, 2003. "Intangibles and intellectual capital: an introduction to a special issue," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 597-603.
    2. Ernst Verwaal & Martin Klein & Jefferson Falce, 2022. "Business Model Involvement, Adaptive Capacity, and the Triple Bottom Line at the Base of the Pyramid," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(3), pages 607-621, December.
    3. David Mendes & Jorge Gomes & Mário Romao, 2017. "Creating Intangible Value through a Corporate Employee Portal," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(3), pages 125-149.
    4. Feng Gu & Weimin Wang, 2005. "Intangible Assets, Information Complexity, and Analysts' Earnings Forecasts," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(9-10), pages 1673-1702.
    5. Mojtaba Vaismoradi & Hannele Turunen & Terese Bondas, 2013. "Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 398-405, September.
    6. Darya Dancaková & Jakub Sopko & Jozef Glova & Alena Andrejovská, 2022. "The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(20), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Andrejs Čirjevskis, 2021. "Exploring the Link of Real Options Theory with Dynamic Capabilities Framework in Open Innovation-Type Merger and Acquisition Deals," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Atul Chandra & Peter R. Hartley & Gopalan Nair, 2022. "Multiple Volatility Real Options Approach to Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 79-98, June.
    9. Landon Kleis & Paul Chwelos & Ronald V. Ramirez & Iain Cockburn, 2012. "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 42-59, March.
    10. Greg Guest & Emily Namey & Mario Chen, 2020. "A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, May.
    11. Hennink, Monique & Kaiser, Bonnie N., 2022. "Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    12. Feng Gu & Weimin Wang, 2005. "Intangible Assets, Information Complexity, and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(9‐10), pages 1673-1702, November.
    13. Zoltan Matolcsy & Anne Wyatt, 2006. "Capitalized intangibles and financial analysts," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(3), pages 457-479, September.
    14. Aikaterini Koumoutsea & Paraskevi Boufounou & George Mergos, 2023. "Evaluating the Creative Economy Applying the Contingent Valuation Method: A Case Study on the Greek Cultural Heritage Festival," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    15. Higgins, Huong, 2013. "Can securities analysts forecast intangible firms’ earnings?," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 155-174.
    16. Thomas Machiels & Robert Goodspeed & Tine Compernolle & Tom Coppens, 2023. "Creating Flexible Plans for an Uncertain Future: From Exploratory Scenarios to Adaptive Plans With Real Options," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 366-385, May.
    17. Joana Patrícia Coelho & Ana Isabel Couto & Ana Teresa Ferreira-Oliveira, 2024. "Green Human Resource Management: Practices, Benefits, and Constraints—Evidence from the Portuguese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-28, June.
    18. Jieun Han & Hyo-Jin Kang & Gyu Hyun Kwon, 2018. "A Systematic Underpinning and Framing of the Servicescape: Reflections on Future Challenges in Healthcare Services," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shawn Ho & Baljit K. Sidhu & Fan Yang, 2023. "The response of Australian firms to AASB 138 disallowing the recognition of internally generated identifiable intangibles," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3609-3641, September.
    2. Dario Krpan & Jonathan E. Booth & Andreea Damien, 2023. "The positive–negative–competence (PNC) model of psychological responses to representations of robots," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(11), pages 1933-1954, November.
    3. Angelos A. Antzoulatos & Dimitris Karanastasis & Thomas Syrmos, 2022. "The Puzzling Convergence of Intangible Investments," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 28(3), pages 171-182, November.
    4. Chia‐Jung Tu & Yuanchen Chang, 2012. "Analyst responses to stock‐index adjustments: Evidence from MSCI Taiwan Index additions," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 82-89, April.
    5. Guanming He & Helen Mengbing Ren & Richard Taffler, 2020. "The impact of corporate tax avoidance on analyst coverage and forecasts," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 447-477, February.
    6. Laura Arenas & Ana Maria Gil-Lafuente, 2021. "Regime Switching in High-Tech ETFs: Idiosyncratic Volatility and Return," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-25, March.
    7. Kasten, Connor L., 2024. "The fringe benefits of fringe benefits: When firms borrow from their retirement providers," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    8. Feng, Cong & Fay, Scott & Kashmiri, Saim, 2022. "The value relevance of descriptive R&D intensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1394-1407.
    9. Mei-Chen Lin & J. Jimmy Yang, 2023. "Do lottery characteristics matter for analysts’ forecast behavior?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 1057-1091, October.
    10. Sudip Datta & Anand Jha & Manoj Kulchania, 2020. "On accounting’s twenty-first century challenge: evidence on the relation between intangible assets and audit fees," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 123-162, July.
    11. Rahman, Anisur & Talukdar, Bakhtear & Fan, Zaifeng Steve, 2023. "Board independence and analysts' forecast accuracy: R&D perspective," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. Allan Hodgson & Suntharee Lhaopadchan & Raluca Ratiu, 2018. "Is advertising under‐resourced in a growth market? Intangible endogeneity and informed trading issues," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(S1), pages 343-373, November.
    13. Tami Dinh Thi & Wolfgang Schultze, 2011. "Capitalizing research & development and ‘other information’: the incremental information content of accruals versus cash flows," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 241-278, November.
    14. Sualihu, Mohammed Aminu & Yawson, Alfred & Yusoff, Iliyas, 2021. "Do analysts’' forecast properties deter suboptimal labor investment decisions? Evidence from Regulation Fair Disclosure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Feijóo, Claudio & Gómez-Barroso, José Luis & Voigt, Peter, 2014. "Exploring the economic value of personal information from firms’ financial statements," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 248-256.
    16. Wu, Kai & Lai, Seiwai, 2020. "Intangible intensity and stock price crash risk," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Jia, Yuecheng & Simkins, Betty & Feng, Hongrui, 2023. "Political connections and short sellers," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Eiler, Lisa A. & Filzen, Joshua J. & Jackson, Mark & Tama-Sweet, Isho, 2021. "Real earnings management and the properties of analysts' forecasts," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    19. Gaëlle Lenormand & Lionel Touchais, 2008. "La pertinence des actifs incorporels avec les IFRS," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 11(2), pages 173-201, June.
    20. Hamim, Md. Tanvir, 2020. "R&D Investments and Idiosyncratic Volatility," MPRA Paper 101330, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:11:p:656-681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.